Donald Griffin v. Ron E. Barnes

Filing 51

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS O RDERED that Grounds Four through Nine of the Second Amended Petition are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file and serve an Answer to Grounds One through Three of the Second Amended Petition within 45 days of the date of this Order. 46 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (gr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD GRIFFIN, Petitioner, 12 v. 13 14 Case No. CV 14-01012 BRO (RAO) RON E. BARNES, Respondent. 15 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended 18 Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Interim 19 Report and Recommendation. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review 20 of those portions of the Interim Report to which Petitioner’s Objections were 21 directed. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and 22 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Grounds Four through Nine of the Second Amended 23 24 Petition are dismissed with prejudice. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file and serve an Answer 2 to Grounds One through Three of the Second Amended Petition within 45 days of 3 the date of this Order. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 17, 2017 5 6 7 8 By: Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell United States District Court Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?