Alejandro U. Rodriguez v. Warden et al

Filing 34

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge S. James Otero. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 32 . No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (kl)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

v.
WARDEN FCI LOMPOC, et al.,
Defendant.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. CV 14-1041-SJO (AGR)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on

18

file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No

19

objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and

20

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

21
22

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing complaint without
prejudice for failure to prosecute.

23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: March 20, 2015.

S. JAMES OTERO
United States District Judge