Natalie Gordon v. Jagjeet S. Bindra et al

Filing 19

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: To date, Gordon has not filed an amended complaint or any other response. The Court therefore DISMISSES Gordons action WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.). (lc). Modified on 6/23/2014 (lc).

O
JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

NATALIE GORDON,

12
13

Case No. 2:14-cv-01058-ODW(ASx)

Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

v.

14

JAGJEET S. BINDRA; FRANCE A.

15

CORDOVA; BRADFORD M.

16

FREEMAN; RONALD L. OLSON;

17

THOMAS C. SUTTON; PETER J.

18

TAYLOR; VANESSA C.L. CHANG;

19

THEODORE F. CRAVER, JR.; LUIS G.

20

NOGALES; RICHARD T.

21

SCHLOSBERG, III; BRETT WHITE;

22

ROBERT L. ADLER; MARK CLARKE;

23

WILLIAM J. SCILACCI; BERTRAND A.

24

VALDMAN; EDISON

25

INTERNATIONAL, nominal defendant,

26

LACK OF PROSECUTION

Defendants.

27

On June 5, 2014, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and granted

28

Plaintiff leave to amend consistent with Rule 11(b). (ECF No. 18.) The Court stated

1

that Gordon had 14 days in which to file an amended complaint, which fell on

2

June 19, 2014.

3

To date, Gordon has not filed an amended complaint or any other response.

4

The Court therefore DISMISSES Gordon’s action WITHOUT PREJUDICE for

5

lack of prosecution. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

June 23, 2014

9
10
11

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2