Loree Rodkin Management Corp. v. Tres Glam By Lisa Gastineau Ltd et al

Filing 47

CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 46 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (ah)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 LOREE RODKIN MANAGEMENT CORP., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. 2:14-cv-01132-MMM-SSx v. CONSENT JUDGMENT TRES GLAM BY LISA GASTINEAU, LTD, A New York corporation; LISA GASTINEAU, an individual, and BRITTNY GASTINEAU, an individual; and DOES 1-10. Defendants. The parties, having (i) entered into a written settlement agreement (the 20 “Settlement Agreement”) resolving this dispute and (ii) jointly moved for entry of 21 this Consent Judgment terminating this proceeding, and for good cause shown, it is 22 hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. 23 This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action 24 under § 501 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501, and under 17 U.S.C §§ 101, et 25 seq., 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. 2. 26 Plaintiff Loree Rodkin Management Corp. (“LRMC”) is a 27 California corporation with its principal place of business located in Los Angeles, 28 California. A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES CONSENT JUDGMENT 2:14-CV-01132-MMM-SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3. Defendant Tres Glam By Lisa Gastineau, Ltd., is a New York corporation with its principal place of business located in New York City. 4. Defendant Lisa Gastineau is an individual and resident of the State of California. 5. Defendant Brittny Gastineau is an individual and resident of the State of California. 6. Defendants Tres Glam by Lisa Gastineau, Ltd., Lisa Gastineau and Brittny Gastineau are collectively referred to herein as “Defendants.” 7. LRMC designs, manufactures and sells fine jewelry and is the 10 owner of numerous copyright registrations in jewelry designs. All of LRMC’s 11 copyright registrations in its jewelry designs, as of October 3, 2014, are hereinafter 12 referred to as “LRMC’s Registered Jewelry Designs.” 13 8. Portions of the Settlement Agreement are confidential. A 14 complete copy of all of LRMC’s copyright registrations and design deposits, which 15 have been issued as of October 3, 2014, is an exhibit to the Settlement Agreement. 16 One non-confidential term of the Settlement Agreement is that Defendants have 17 agreed to entry of the following permanent injunction. PERMANENT INJUNCTION 18 19 9. Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, 20 representatives, and all persons acting in concert or participation with any of them, 21 are permanently enjoining from: 22 a. Directly, in any media, manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, 23 advertising, promoting, giving away, of otherwise transferring 24 ownership of, or renting, leasing, lending, copying, or importing 25 any products which infringe upon LRMC’s Registered Jewelry 26 Designs; 27 28 b. Manufacturing, producing, distributing or displaying any product bearing any reproduction, copy, or imitation of LRMC’s A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES -2- CONSENT JUDGMENT 2:14-CV-01132-MMM-SS P Registered Jewelry Designs; and, 1 c. Importing, distributing, and/or offering for sale products 2 embodying LRMC’s Registered Jewelry Designs 3 4 (The “Permanent Injunction.”) 10. 5 All claims filed by LRMC in this proceeding are hereby 6 dismissed with prejudice and the action is hereby dismissed, subject to the 7 continuing jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of enforcing the Permanent 8 Injunction. 9 11. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred 10 in connection with this matter without recourse to any other party. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Date: November 12, 2014 14 __________________________________ 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES -3- CONSENT JUDGMENT 2:14-CV-01132-MMM-SS P

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?