Loree Rodkin Management Corp. v. Tres Glam By Lisa Gastineau Ltd et al
Filing
47
CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 46 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (ah)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
LOREE RODKIN MANAGEMENT
CORP., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 2:14-cv-01132-MMM-SSx
v.
CONSENT JUDGMENT
TRES GLAM BY LISA
GASTINEAU, LTD, A New York
corporation; LISA GASTINEAU, an
individual, and BRITTNY
GASTINEAU, an individual; and
DOES 1-10.
Defendants.
The parties, having (i) entered into a written settlement agreement (the
20
“Settlement Agreement”) resolving this dispute and (ii) jointly moved for entry of
21
this Consent Judgment terminating this proceeding, and for good cause shown, it is
22
hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
1.
23
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action
24
under § 501 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501, and under 17 U.S.C §§ 101, et
25
seq., 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338.
2.
26
Plaintiff Loree Rodkin Management Corp. (“LRMC”) is a
27
California corporation with its principal place of business located in Los Angeles,
28
California.
A RENT F OX LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
CONSENT JUDGMENT
2:14-CV-01132-MMM-SS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3.
Defendant Tres Glam By Lisa Gastineau, Ltd., is a New York
corporation with its principal place of business located in New York City.
4.
Defendant Lisa Gastineau is an individual and resident of the
State of California.
5.
Defendant Brittny Gastineau is an individual and resident of the
State of California.
6.
Defendants Tres Glam by Lisa Gastineau, Ltd., Lisa Gastineau
and Brittny Gastineau are collectively referred to herein as “Defendants.”
7.
LRMC designs, manufactures and sells fine jewelry and is the
10
owner of numerous copyright registrations in jewelry designs. All of LRMC’s
11
copyright registrations in its jewelry designs, as of October 3, 2014, are hereinafter
12
referred to as “LRMC’s Registered Jewelry Designs.”
13
8.
Portions of the Settlement Agreement are confidential. A
14
complete copy of all of LRMC’s copyright registrations and design deposits, which
15
have been issued as of October 3, 2014, is an exhibit to the Settlement Agreement.
16
One non-confidential term of the Settlement Agreement is that Defendants have
17
agreed to entry of the following permanent injunction.
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
18
19
9.
Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees,
20
representatives, and all persons acting in concert or participation with any of them,
21
are permanently enjoining from:
22
a. Directly, in any media, manufacturing, selling, offering for sale,
23
advertising, promoting, giving away, of otherwise transferring
24
ownership of, or renting, leasing, lending, copying, or importing
25
any products which infringe upon LRMC’s Registered Jewelry
26
Designs;
27
28
b. Manufacturing, producing, distributing or displaying any
product bearing any reproduction, copy, or imitation of LRMC’s
A RENT F OX LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
-2-
CONSENT JUDGMENT
2:14-CV-01132-MMM-SS
P
Registered Jewelry Designs; and,
1
c. Importing, distributing, and/or offering for sale products
2
embodying LRMC’s Registered Jewelry Designs
3
4
(The “Permanent Injunction.”)
10.
5
All claims filed by LRMC in this proceeding are hereby
6
dismissed with prejudice and the action is hereby dismissed, subject to the
7
continuing jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of enforcing the Permanent
8
Injunction.
9
11.
Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred
10
in connection with this matter without recourse to any other party.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Date: November 12, 2014
14
__________________________________
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RENT F OX LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
-3-
CONSENT JUDGMENT
2:14-CV-01132-MMM-SS
P
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?