Marv W. Durment et al v. The Burlington Insurance Company et al

Filing 143

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Judgment is now entered in favor of Defendant Endurance and against PlaintiffsMarv W. Durment, Minadora Holdings LLC, and Jarvis Enterprises, Inc., d/b/aOrange Precision Metal Fabrication as to each and every caus e of action assertedagainst Defendant Endurance set forth in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint.Judgment is now entered in favor of Defendant Burlington and against PlaintiffsMarv W. Durment, Minadora Holdings LLC, and Jarvis Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Orange Precision Metal Fabrication as to each and every cause of action assertedagainst Defendant Burlington set forth in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint.An award of costs may be recovered, in an amount to be determined, followingthe filing of the appropriate application and the consideration of any objections. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

Locke Lord LLP

300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, CA 90071

12

MARV W. DURMENT, et al.,

13

Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

vs.
THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01231 JAK-E
Hon. John A. Kronstadt; Courtroom 750
JUDGMENT
JS-6

24
25
26
27
28

1
JUDGMENT

1

Plaintiff Marv W. Durment (“Durment”) filed a Motion for Partial Summary

2

Judgment and Defendant Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company

3

(“Endurance”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment which were both heard on

4

October 27, 2014 before this Court. Durment’s Motion for Partial Summary

5

Judgment was denied and Endurance’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted.

6

Durment then filed a Motion for Reconsideration regarding the Order on the

7

Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Motion for Summary Judgment which was

8

denied.

9
10
11

Defendant the Burlington Insurance Company (“Burlington”) filed a Motion for
Summary Judgment which was granted.
Judgment is now entered in favor of Defendant Endurance and against Plaintiffs

Locke Lord LLP

300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, CA 90071

12

Marv W. Durment, Minadora Holdings LLC, and Jarvis Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a

13

Orange Precision Metal Fabrication as to each and every cause of action asserted

14

against Defendant Endurance set forth in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.

15

Judgment is now entered in favor of Defendant Burlington and against Plaintiffs

16

Marv W. Durment, Minadora Holdings LLC, and Jarvis Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a

17

Orange Precision Metal Fabrication as to each and every cause of action asserted

18

against Defendant Burlington set forth in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.

19
20

An award of costs may be recovered, in an amount to be determined, following
the filing of the appropriate application and the consideration of any objections.

21
22
23

Dated: April 8, 2015
HON. JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

1
JUDGMENT