Worth Baker v. Universal Protection Services et al
Filing
6
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. The Court thus ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing within 21 days of the date of this Order why his lawsuit should not be dismissed because he has not filed any proofs of service with the Court or, apparently, properly served Defendants. He is reminded that merely mailing a Summons and Complaint to a defendant is not valid service under Rule 4(e) or California Code of Civil Procedure sections 415.10, 4 15.20, or 415.30 unless the defendant signs and returns an acknowledgment that he accepted such service. Plaintiff is further advised that ignorance of the legal requirements of service of process is not "good cause" under Rule 4(m). Failure to fully and timely comply with this Order may result in Plaintiff's case being dismissed for failure to prosecute and under Rule 4(m). (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL
Case No. CV 14-1235-SVW (JPR)
Date: June 30, 2014
Title: Worth Baker v. Universal Prot. Servs. et al.
============================================================
DOCKET ENTRY: Order to Show Cause
===========================================================
PRESENT:
HON. JEAN P. ROSENBLUTH, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Karl Lozada
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
None present
n/a
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)
On February 18, 2014, Plaintiff filed this civil rights action. Under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), he had 120 days from that date to properly serve the
Complaint on Defendants. Under the Court’s April 4, 2014 minute order, he had until
June 25, 2014, to file proof of service on each Defendant with the Court. The Court
expressly warned him that his failure to effect timely and proper service might result
in his lawsuit being dismissed. To date, Plaintiff has not filed any proofs of service.
The Court thus ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing within 21 days of
the date of this Order why his lawsuit should not be dismissed because he has not
filed any proofs of service with the Court or, apparently, properly served Defendants.
He is reminded that merely mailing a Summons and Complaint to a defendant is not
valid service under Rule 4(e) or California Code of Civil Procedure sections 415.10,
415.20, or 415.30 unless the defendant signs and returns an acknowledgment that he
accepted such service. Plaintiff is further advised that ignorance of the legal
requirements of service of process is not “good cause” under Rule 4(m). Failure to
fully and timely comply with this Order may result in Plaintiff’s case being dismissed
for failure to prosecute and under Rule 4(m).
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk___kl_____
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?