Edward Makaron v. GE Security Manufacturing Inc et al

Filing 77

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT UTCFSA by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs take nothing in their claims against UTCFSA, that the claims against UTCFSA be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and that Plaintiffs and UTCFSA, by agreement, bear their own fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

13

EDWARD MAKARON, AND
BIANCA CARTER,
INDIVIDUALLY AND ON
BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED,

14

PLAINTIFFS,

12

15
16
17
18
19

V.
UTC FIRE & SECURITY
AMERICAS CORPORATION, INC.,;
SECURITY ONE ALARM SYSTEMS;
AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.

Case No. CV 14-1274-GW(AGRx)
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANT UTCFSA
Hearing Date:

May 18, 2015

Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m.
Judge:

Hon. George H. Wu

Place:

Courtroom 10

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT UTCFSA

1

This action came on for hearing before the Court, on May 18, 2015, the

2

Honorable George H. Wu, District Judge Presiding, on the Motion for Summary

3

Judgment filed by UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. (“UTCFSA”).

4

The evidence presented having been fully considered, the issues having been duly

5

heard, and a decision on the motion having been rendered,

6

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs take nothing in their

7

claims against UTCFSA, that the claims against UTCFSA be dismissed on the

8

merits with prejudice, and that Plaintiffs and UTCFSA, by agreement, bear their

9

own fees and costs.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 19, 2015

12
Honorable George H. Wu
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16

21675734

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT UTCFSA