Securities and Exchange Commission v. Braslau et al
Filing
93
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, andDECREED as follows: Rand J. Chortkoff is liable for the SEC's claims of fraud and acting as an unregistered broker-dealer; The Estate of Rand J. Chortkoff shall disgorge t he amount of One Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars ($153,400) to Plaintiff SEC, representing Chortkoff's ill-gotten gains; and The Estate of Rand J. Chortkoff shall pay Plaintiff SEC prejudgmentinterest in the amount of Twelve Thousand, Six Hundred and Fifteen Dollars($12,615). IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:14-cv-01290-ODW (AJWx)
JUDGMENT
v.
SAMUEL BRASLAU; RAND J.
CHORTKOFF; and STUART E.
RAWITT,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) moved for summary
20
judgment against the Estate of Rand J. Chortkoff, the one remaining defendant in this
21
case, and Chortkoff’s estate did not oppose. (See ECF Nos. 85; 90.) On March 3,
22
2017, this Court granted the SEC’s motion.
23
24
25
26
27
28
In accordance with that Order, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED as follows:
1.
Rand J. Chortkoff is liable for the SEC’s claims of fraud and acting as an
unregistered broker-dealer;
2.
The Estate of Rand J. Chortkoff shall disgorge the amount of One
Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars ($153,400) to Plaintiff SEC,
1
2
representing Chortkoff’s ill-gotten gains; and
3.
The Estate of Rand J. Chortkoff shall pay Plaintiff SEC prejudgment
3
interest in the amount of Twelve Thousand, Six Hundred and Fifteen Dollars
4
($12,615).
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
March 6, 2017
9
10
11
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?