Michiko Shiota Gingery, et al v. City of Glendale et al

Filing 48

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: Pursuant to the Court's 8/4/2014 Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant City of Glendale ("Defendant"), which dismissed the sole federal claim asserted by plaintiffs Michiko Shi ota Gingery, Koichi Mera, and GAHT-USA Corporation (collectively "Plaintiffs") with prejudice, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' remaining state law claim and dismissed that claim without prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' federal constitutional claim for violation of the foreign affairs power and Supremacy Clause is dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs' remaining state law claim is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

MICHIKO SHIOTA GINGERY,
KOICHI MERA, and GAHT-USA
CORPORATION,

13

CV 14-1291 PA (AJWx)
JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,

14

v.

15

CITY OF GLENDALE,

16

Defendant.

17
18
Pursuant to the Court’s August 4, 2014 Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss

19
20

filed by defendant City of Glendale (“Defendant”), which dismissed the sole federal claim

21

asserted by plaintiffs Michiko Shiota Gingery, Koichi Mera, and GAHT-USA Corporation

22

(collectively “Plaintiffs”) with prejudice, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction

23

over Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claim and dismissed that claim without prejudice,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ federal

24
25

constitutional claim for violation of the foreign affairs power and Supremacy Clause is

26

dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claim is dismissed without

27

prejudice.

28

....

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take
nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

DATED: August 4, 2014

_________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-