Michiko Shiota Gingery, et al v. City of Glendale et al

Filing 48

JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: Pursuant to the Court's 8/4/2014 Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant City of Glendale ("Defendant"), which dismissed the sole federal claim asserted by plaintiffs Michiko Shi ota Gingery, Koichi Mera, and GAHT-USA Corporation (collectively "Plaintiffs") with prejudice, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' remaining state law claim and dismissed that claim without prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' federal constitutional claim for violation of the foreign affairs power and Supremacy Clause is dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs' remaining state law claim is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MICHIKO SHIOTA GINGERY, KOICHI MERA, and GAHT-USA CORPORATION, 13 CV 14-1291 PA (AJWx) JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 CITY OF GLENDALE, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Pursuant to the Court’s August 4, 2014 Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss 19 20 filed by defendant City of Glendale (“Defendant”), which dismissed the sole federal claim 21 asserted by plaintiffs Michiko Shiota Gingery, Koichi Mera, and GAHT-USA Corporation 22 (collectively “Plaintiffs”) with prejudice, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction 23 over Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claim and dismissed that claim without prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ federal 24 25 constitutional claim for violation of the foreign affairs power and Supremacy Clause is 26 dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claim is dismissed without 27 prejudice. 28 .... 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing and that Defendant shall have its costs of suit. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATED: August 4, 2014 _________________________________ Percy Anderson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?