Jeremy Bassett et al v. City of Burbank et al

Filing 41

PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. The Court Orders the terms of the parties Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Confidential Information. (36) (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (gr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAVID D. LAWRENCE, State Bar No. 123039 DENNIS M. GONZALES, Bar No. 59414 RAYMOND W. SAKAI, State Bar No. 193507 rsakai@lbaclaw.com LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200 Glendale, California 91210-1219 Telephone No. (818) 545-1925 Facsimile No. (818) 545-1937 Attorneys for Defendants City of Burbank and Chief Scott LaChasse 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) JEREMY BASSETT, APRIL RICKMAN, G. B. through his guardian ) ad litem JEREMY BASSETT, R. B. ) through his guardian ad litem JEREMY ) BASSETT, J. B. through her guardian ) ad litem JEREMY BASSETT, A. B. ) ) through her guardian ad litem ) JEREMY BASSETT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF BURBANK; SCOTT ) LACHASSE; ANTHONY VALENTO; MARK ARMENDARIZ; ) GAYLE BASSETT; and DOES 1-10, ) ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. CV 14-01348 SVW (CWx) Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS [Stipulation for Protective Order filed concurrently herewith] Having reviewed and considered the Parties’ Stipulation for Protective 23 Order Governing Confidential Information Produced During Discovery, good 24 cause showing therein, IT IS SO ORDERED: 25 1. Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are Jeremy Bassett, April Rickman, G. B. 26 through his guardian ad litem Jeremy Bassett, R. B. through his guardian ad litem 27 Jeremy Bassett, J. B. through her guardian ad litem Jeremy Bassett, and A. B. 28 through her guardian ad litem Jeremy Bassett, (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”). 1 BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3 2. Disclosing Party. Disclosing Party shall refer to Defendant City of Burbank. 3. Receiving Party. The Receiving Party shall refer to all Parties 4 receiving information from Disclosing Party pursuant to this protective order. 5 The Receiving Parties are the Parties and their agents as set forth in Paragraph 6 Nos. 17 and 18 of this Protective Order. 7 4. Case Summary. This case arises from Plaintiffs’ allegations that 8 their rights under federal and state law were violated as a result of purported 9 wrongful conduct by Defendants related to Plaintiff Jeremy Bassett’s two arrests 10 in 2012 and related criminal prosecution. Plaintiffs further allege that Defendant 11 Valento and Gayle Bassett, Plaintiff Jeremy Bassett’s ex-wife, conspired to extort 12 monies from Plaintiff Jeremy Bassett regarding criminal charges filed against 13 Plaintiff Jeremy Bassett. Plaintiffs also claim that in mid-2013, Defendant 14 Valento used excessive force on Plaintiff G.B. 15 5. Good Cause Statement and Confidential Materials. The Parties 16 anticipate that during discovery in this action they will exchange documents, 17 items, or materials and other information that contain sensitive and confidential 18 information that derives actual or potential value from not being generally known 19 to the public and are the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain their 20 confidentiality. The Parties have agreed that the below-listed documents shall be 21 designated confidential documents and/or writings because the Parties believe, in 22 good faith, that these documents and/or writings are protected by the Official 23 Information Privilege, the right to privacy guaranteed in Federal Constitution, 24 First Amendment and California Constitution, Article I, Section I, and various 25 California Government, Penal, and Evidence Code sections, and thus protected 26 from disclosure. This will be accomplished by affixing to such document or 27 writing a legend, such as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT 28 TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or words of similar effect. Documents and writings 2 BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 so designated, hereinafter, collectively, (“Confidential Information”), shall be 2 treated in accordance with the terms of this stipulation/protective order. 3 Documents, writings and things to be designated as such, include the following: a) 4 Any material relating to or regarding the personnel files and/or 5 records of any employee or former employee of the Burbank Police Department, 6 including Defendants Mark Armendariz and Anthony Valento ; b) 7 Any material relating to any personnel investigations 8 conducted by the Burbank Police Department or other law enforcement agency 9 regarding any member or former member of the Burbank Police Department, 10 including Defendants Anthony Valento and Mark Armendariz; and, c) 11 12 13 Any material relating to incidents involving Plaintiffs containing sensitive and private information regarding third parties. 6. Interests In Favor Of Protective Order. This Order is necessary to 14 expedite discovery, while maintaining confidential and private information of 15 Defendants and third parties, and to protect parties or persons from annoyance, 16 embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense. Further, disclosure of 17 such information without a protective order may compromise the safety of 18 Defendants and third parties. 19 7. Stipulation. The Parties are entering into this Stipulation for 20 Protective Order to protect against any improper disclosure or risk of 21 circumvention of law that might result from disclosure of sensitive and 22 confidential information as described in this Order. To informally resolve this 23 discovery matter, the Parties have agreed to this Stipulation for Protective Order 24 that carefully limits the use and dissemination of the Confidential Information. 25 8. Confidential Information. This Protective Order shall apply to all 26 Confidential Information, produced by Disclosing Party to the Receiving Party. 27 The Confidential Information may be contained in originals and copies of 28 relevant interrogatory responses obtained from Disclosing Party in this matter; 3 BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 originals and copies of relevant documents responsive to requests for production 2 of documents obtained from the Disclosing Party in this matter; and originals and 3 copies of transcripts, video recordings, and audio recordings of any deposition 4 taken in this matter during which the Confidential Information is used, 5 mentioned, reviewed, discussed, and/or referred to. The Confidential Information 6 shall be subject to this Protective Order as follows: 9. 7 Storage Of Confidential Information. Immediately upon production 8 by the Disclosing Party, attorneys for the Receiving Party shall personally secure 9 and maintain the Confidential Information in their possession. The Confidential 10 Information shall not, under any circumstances, be left in an open or unsecured 11 location where unauthorized persons (such as unauthorized employees of counsel, 12 cleaning personnel, etc.) might have access to them. 10. 13 Confidential Information Legend. All documents containing 14 Confidential Information shall be stamped “CONFIDENTIAL” or 15 “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or words of similar 16 effect. 17 11. Limitation Of Use Of Confidential Information. Attorneys for the 18 Receiving Party shall not cause or knowingly permit disclosure of the contents of 19 the Confidential Information, in any manner, including orally, beyond the 20 disclosure permitted under the terms and conditions of this Order. Any such 21 disclosure shall be construed as a violation of this Order, except when used for 22 purposes of this litigation as described in Paragraph Nos. 15 and 16 of this 23 Protective Order. 24 12. Testimony Regarding The Confidential Information. In the case of 25 depositions, any party may designate all or any portion of the deposition 26 testimony given in this litigation as Confidential Information orally during the 27 deposition. Any questions intended to elicit testimony regarding the contents of 28 the Confidential Information shall be conducted only in the presence of persons 4 BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 authorized to review the Confidential Information as provided in this Order. Any 2 deposition transcript containing such questions and testimony shall be subject to 3 the same protections and precautions applicable to the Confidential Information. 4 13. Inadvertent Disclosure. If the Disclosing Party inadvertently 5 produces any Confidential Information without designating it as such, it may be 6 remedied by (1) promptly notifying the other parties of the error; and (2) 7 providing a substitute copy of the Confidential Information with a proper legend. 8 In that event, the Receiving Parties who have obtained inadvertently produced 9 undesignated Confidential Information will: (1) return the previously produced 10 Confidential Information and destroy all copies thereof; and (2) if the Receiving 11 Party has already disseminated the Confidential Information to any person, the 12 Receiving Party will notify all such persons receiving the Confidential 13 Information in writing of the need to return such Confidential Information and not 14 to further disseminate it. This provision applies to any and all Confidential 15 Information produced to the Receiving Party. 16 14. Limitations On The Non-Litigation Use Of Confidential 17 Information. The confidentiality of the Confidential Information exchanged 18 during discovery in this action shall be maintained, and all Confidential 19 Information exchanged will be used solely for the litigation of this action entitled. 20 Specifically, the Receiving Party may not use such documents, records, or other 21 information (or the contents thereof) for any other purpose, including use as 22 background material, or for inclusion in books, magazines, newspapers, or other 23 publications. The Receiving Party is prohibited from placing any of the 24 Confidential Information on the Internet. 25 15. Court Filings. If necessary in the judgment of attorneys for 26 Receiving Party, said attorneys may show or reveal the contents of the 27 Confidential Information to the court only pursuant to Local Rule 79-5. 28 16. Other Persons Authorized To Review Confidential Information. The 5 BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Receiving Parties’ attorneys of record may be permitted to see originals and 2 obtain copies of the Confidential Information covered by this Order. Also, 3 Defendants, including officers, directors, employees, and experts thereof may be 4 permitted to review the Confidential Information. Additionally, paralegals, 5 secretaries, expert witnesses, and other individuals and entities that may be 6 employed or retained by the Receiving Party to assist in the preparation and/or the 7 litigation of this action may be permitted to see originals and obtain copies of the 8 Confidential Information covered by this Order, provided such experts and 9 employees have first executed the written statement set forth in Paragraph No. 18 10 11 below, and comply with the provisions of that section. 17. Applicability Of Order To Other Persons. Prior to the disclosure of 12 any Confidential Information to any person described above, attorneys for the 13 Receiving Party who seeks to use or disclose such Confidential Information shall 14 first provide any such person with a copy of this Order, and shall cause him or her 15 to execute the following acknowledgment: 16 “I, _____________________________, do solemnly swear that 17 I am fully familiar with the terms of the Stipulated Protective 18 Order entered in this action and hereby agree to comply with 19 and be bound by the terms and conditions of the said Order 20 with respect to the handling, use and disclosure of each 21 Confidential Document. I understand that I may be subject to 22 penalties for contempt of Court if I violate this Order and 23 hereby consent to the jurisdiction of said Court for purposes of 24 enforcing this Order. 25 Dated: __________ /s/_____________________________” 26 This written requirement applies to, but is not limited to, paralegals, secretaries, 27 expert witnesses, and other individuals and entities that may be employed or 28 retained by the Receiving Party’s counsel to assist in the preparation and/or the 6 BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 litigation of this action. The Receiving Party shall be responsible for maintaining 2 the signed original of each such written statement until the conclusion of these 3 proceedings, including any appeal. 4 18. No waiver of objections. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order 5 constitutes any decision by the Court concerning discovery disputes or the 6 admission into evidence of any specific document or testimony or liability for 7 payment of any costs of production or reproduction of documents. This Order 8 also does not constitute a waiver by any party of any right to object to discovery 9 or admission into evidence of any document, record, testimony or other 10 information that is subject to this Order. Nor do Defendants waive any privileges, 11 including, but not limited to, the investigatory files or official information 12 privileges, see, e.g., Weiner v. FBI, 943 F. 2d 972, 985 (9th Cir. 1991), or Miller 13 v. Pancucci, 141 F.R.D. 292 (C.D. Cal. 1992), by entering into this order. 14 19. Subpoena for Confidential Information. In the event that the 15 Receiving Party receives a subpoena, discovery request, or other legal process 16 seeking production of Confidential Information, the Receiving Party must give 17 prompt written notice to the Disclosing Party. The Receiving Party shall inform 18 the person or entity seeking the information of the existence of this Stipulation 19 and Order and shall not produce the Confidential Information absent a Court 20 Order requiring such production. 21 20. Modification. For good cause, any party may seek a modification of 22 this Order, first by attempting to obtain the consent of the other parties to such 23 modification, and then, absent consent, by application to this Court. 24 21. Return of Confidential Information. No more than thirty (30) 25 calendar days after the conclusion of this case the Receiving Party and every 26 other person and/or entity who received originals or copies of the Confidential 27 Information shall return all originals, copies of the Confidential Information, and 28 material derived therefrom, including, but not limited to, all log(s) of persons 7 BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 authorized to review the protected documents and the written statement(s) 2 acknowledging the terms and provisions of this Order pursuant to Paragraph 3 No. 18 of this Order, to the Disclosing Party care of: 4 5 6 7 Dennis M. Gonzales, Esq. Raymond W. Sakai, Esq. Lawrence Beach Allen & Choi, PC 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200 Glendale, California 91210-1219 8 9 Alternatively, the Receiving Party and every other person and/or entity who 10 received originals or copies of the Confidential Information may destroy all such 11 material and material derived therefrom within thirty (30) calendar days after the 12 conclusion of this case. Additionally, within thirty (30) calendar days after the 13 conclusion of this case, counsel for the Receiving Party shall send a signed 14 declaration stating that such material has been destroyed pursuant to this 15 Protective Order. This case has concluded when (i) a final judgment has been 16 entered by the Court or the case has otherwise been dismissed with prejudice; (ii) 17 the time for any objection to or request for reconsideration of such a judgment or 18 dismissal has expired; (iii) all available appeals have concluded or the time for 19 such appeals has expired; and (iv) any post appeal proceedings have themselves 20 concluded. 21 22. Survivability Of This Protective Order. This Stipulation and 22 Protective Order shall survive the termination of this action, and the Court shall 23 retain jurisdiction to enforce it. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: June 13, 2014 _ 28 _______________________________ Honorable Carla Woehrle United States Magistrate Judge 8 BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?