Jeremy Bassett et al v. City of Burbank et al
Filing
47
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. The Court Orders the terms of the parties Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Confidential Information. (41) (42) (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (gr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DAVID D. LAWRENCE, State Bar No. 123039
DENNIS M. GONZALES, Bar No. 59414
RAYMOND W. SAKAI, State Bar No. 193507
rsakai@lbaclaw.com
LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC
100 West Broadway, Suite 1200
Glendale, California 91210-1219
Telephone No. (818) 545-1925
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
Facsimile No. (818) 545-1937
Attorneys for Defendants
City of Burbank and Chief Scott LaChasse
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
)
JEREMY BASSETT, APRIL
RICKMAN, G. B. through his guardian )
ad litem JEREMY BASSETT, R. B. )
through his guardian ad litem JEREMY )
BASSETT, J. B. through her guardian )
ad litem JEREMY BASSETT, A. B. )
)
through her guardian ad litem
)
JEREMY BASSETT,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF BURBANK; SCOTT
)
LACHASSE; ANTHONY
VALENTO; MARK ARMENDARIZ; )
GAYLE BASSETT; and DOES 1-10, )
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No. CV 14-01348 SVW (CWx)
Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
RE CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS
[Stipulation for Protective Order filed
concurrently herewith]
Having reviewed and considered the Parties’ Stipulation for Protective
23
Order Governing Confidential Information Produced During Discovery, good
24
cause showing therein, IT IS SO ORDERED:
25
1.
Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are Jeremy Bassett, April Rickman, G. B.
26
through his guardian ad litem Jeremy Bassett, R. B. through his guardian ad litem
27
Jeremy Bassett, J. B. through her guardian ad litem Jeremy Bassett, and A. B.
28
through her guardian ad litem Jeremy Bassett, (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”).
1
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
2.
Disclosing Party. Disclosing Party shall refer to Defendants City of
Burbank and Anthony Valento and non-party City of Glendale.
3.
Receiving Party. The Receiving Party shall refer to all Parties
4
receiving information from Disclosing Party pursuant to this protective order.
5
The Receiving Parties are the Parties and their agents as set forth in Paragraph
6
Nos. 17 and 18 of this Protective Order.
7
4.
Case Summary. This case arises from Plaintiffs’ allegations that
8
their rights under federal and state law were violated as a result of purported
9
wrongful conduct by Defendants related to Plaintiff Jeremy Bassett’s two arrests
10
in 2012 and related criminal prosecution. Plaintiffs further allege that Defendant
11
Valento and Gayle Bassett, Plaintiff Jeremy Bassett’s ex-wife, conspired to extort
12
monies from Plaintiff Jeremy Bassett regarding criminal charges filed against
13
Plaintiff Jeremy Bassett. Plaintiffs also claim that in mid-2013, Defendant
14
Valento used excessive force on Plaintiff G.B.
15
5.
Good Cause Statement and Confidential Materials. The Parties
16
anticipate that during discovery in this action they will exchange documents,
17
items, or materials and other information that contain sensitive and confidential
18
information that derives actual or potential value from not being generally known
19
to the public and are the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain their
20
confidentiality. The Parties have agreed that the below-listed documents shall be
21
designated confidential documents and/or writings because the Defendants
22
believe, in good faith, that these documents and/or writings are protected by the
23
Official Information Privilege, the right to privacy guaranteed in Federal
24
Constitution, First Amendment and California Constitution, Article I, Section I,
25
and various California Government, Penal, and Evidence Code sections, and thus
26
protected from disclosure. This will be accomplished by affixing to such
27
document or writing a legend, such as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL
28
– SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or words of similar effect. Documents
2
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
and writings so designated, hereinafter, collectively, (“Confidential
2
Information”), shall be treated in accordance with the terms of this
3
stipulation/protective order. Documents, writings and things to be designated as
4
such, include the following:
5
a)
Any material relating to or regarding the personnel files and/or
6
records of any employee or former employee of the Burbank Police Department,
7
including Defendants Mark Armendariz and Anthony Valento ;
b)
8
9
Any material relating to any personnel investigations
conducted by the Burbank Police Department regarding any member or former
10
member of the Burbank Police Department, including Defendants Anthony
11
Valento and Mark Armendariz;
c)
12
13
Any material relating to incidents involving Plaintiffs
containing sensitive and private information regarding third parties;
d)
14
Any material, including but not limited to records from the
15
Glendale Police Department, pertaining to allegations or investigations about
16
abuse of Plaintiff minors or any minors, which is produced pursuant to subpoena;
17
and
e)
18
Any confidential, sensitive and/or private material relating to
19
the federal criminal prosecution of Anthony Valento and Gayle Bassett, including
20
material from the United States Attorney’s Office.
21
6.
Interests In Favor Of Protective Order. This Order is necessary to
22
expedite discovery, while maintaining confidential and private information of
23
Defendants and third parties, and Defendants believe it is necessary to protect
24
parties or persons from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden
25
or expense. Further, Defendant contends disclosure of such information without a
26
protective order may compromise the safety of Defendants and third parties.
27
28
7.
Stipulation. The Parties are entering into this Stipulation for
Protective Order to protect against any improper disclosure or risk of
3
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
circumvention of law that might result from disclosure of sensitive and
2
confidential information as described in this Order. To informally resolve this
3
discovery matter, the Parties have agreed to this Stipulation for Protective Order
4
that carefully limits the use and dissemination of the Confidential Information.
5
8.
Confidential Information. This Protective Order shall apply to all
6
Confidential Information, produced by Disclosing Party to the Receiving Party.
7
The Confidential Information may be contained in originals and copies of
8
relevant interrogatory responses obtained from Disclosing Party in this matter;
9
originals and copies of relevant documents responsive to requests for production
10
of documents obtained from the Disclosing Party in this matter; and originals and
11
copies of transcripts, video recordings, and audio recordings of any deposition
12
taken in this matter during which the Confidential Information is used,
13
mentioned, reviewed, discussed, and/or referred to. The Confidential Information
14
shall be subject to this Protective Order as follows:
15
9.
Storage Of Confidential Information. Immediately upon production
16
by the Disclosing Party, attorneys for the Receiving Party shall personally secure
17
and maintain the Confidential Information in their possession. The Confidential
18
Information shall not, under any circumstances, be left in an open or unsecured
19
location where unauthorized persons (such as unauthorized employees of counsel,
20
cleaning personnel, etc.) might have access to them.
21
10.
Confidential Information Legend. All documents containing
22
Confidential Information shall be stamped “CONFIDENTIAL” or
23
“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or words of similar
24
effect. Such stamp shall not obscure the document.
25
11.
Limitation Of Use Of Confidential Information. Attorneys for the
26
Receiving Party shall not cause or knowingly permit disclosure of the contents of
27
the Confidential Information, in any manner, including orally, beyond the
28
disclosure permitted under the terms and conditions of this Order. Any such
4
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
disclosure shall be construed as a violation of this Order, except when used for
2
purposes of this litigation as described in Paragraph Nos. 15 and 16 of this
3
Protective Order.
4
12.
Testimony Regarding The Confidential Information. In the case of
5
depositions, any party may designate all or any portion of the deposition
6
testimony given in this litigation as Confidential Information orally during the
7
deposition. Any questions intended to elicit testimony regarding the contents of
8
the Confidential Information shall be conducted only in the presence of persons
9
authorized to review the Confidential Information as provided in this Order. The
10
Parties may be present for any such testimony. Any deposition transcript
11
containing such questions and testimony shall be subject to the same protections
12
and precautions applicable to the Confidential Information.
13
13.
Inadvertent Disclosure. If the Disclosing Party inadvertently
14
produces any Confidential Information without designating it as such, it may be
15
remedied by (1) promptly notifying the other parties of the error; and (2)
16
providing a substitute copy of the Confidential Information with a proper legend.
17
In that event, the Receiving Parties who have obtained inadvertently produced
18
undesignated Confidential Information will: (1) return the previously produced
19
Confidential Information and destroy all copies thereof; and (2) if the Receiving
20
Party has already disseminated the Confidential Information to any person, the
21
Receiving Party will notify all such persons the information was disseminated to
22
the Confidential Information in writing of the need to return such Confidential
23
Information and not to further disseminate it. This provision applies to any and
24
all Confidential Information produced to the Receiving Party.
25
14.
Limitations On The Non-Litigation Use Of Confidential
26
Information. The confidentiality of the Confidential Information received from
27
Defendant during discovery in this action shall be maintained, and all
28
Confidential Information exchanged will be used solely for the litigation of this
5
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
action entitled. Specifically, the Receiving Party may not use such documents,
2
records, or other information (or the contents thereof) for any other purpose,
3
including use as background material, or for inclusion in books, magazines,
4
newspapers, or other publications. The Receiving Party is prohibited from
5
placing any of the Confidential Information on the Internet.
6
15.
Court Filings. If necessary in the judgment of attorneys for
7
Receiving Party, said attorneys may show or reveal the contents of the
8
Confidential Information to the court only pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 or Ninth
9
Circuit Rule 27-13. Receiving Party will inform the Court and Parties of any
10
Confidential Information it intends to present during trial so appropriate measure
11
may be considered by the Court that may be necessary to protect the Confidential
12
Information. Receiving Party’s presentation of Confidential Information during
13
trial will not require compliance with the written consent as set forth in paragraph
14
16.
Other Persons Authorized To Review Confidential Information. The
15
Receiving Parties’ attorneys of record may be permitted to see originals and
16
obtain copies of the Confidential Information covered by this Order. Also,
17
Defendants, including officers, directors, employees, and experts thereof may be
18
permitted to review the Confidential Information. Additionally, paralegals,
19
secretaries, expert witnesses, and other individuals and entities that may be
20
employed or retained by the Receiving Party to assist in the preparation and/or the
21
litigation of this action may be permitted to see originals and obtain copies of the
22
Confidential Information covered by this Order, provided such experts and
23
employees have first executed the written statement set forth in Paragraph No. 18
24
below, and comply with the provisions of that section. The Parties’ attorneys
25
may review the Confidential Information with the Parties they represent.
26
17.
Applicability Of Order To Other Persons. Prior to the disclosure of
27
any Confidential Information to any person described above, attorneys for the
28
Receiving Party who seeks to use or disclose such Confidential Information shall
6
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
first provide any such person with a copy of this Order, and shall cause him or her
2
to execute the following acknowledgment:
3
“I, _____________________________, do solemnly swear that
4
I am fully familiar with the terms of the Stipulated Protective
5
Order entered in this action and hereby agree to comply with
6
and be bound by the terms and conditions of the said Order
7
with respect to the handling, use and disclosure of each
8
Confidential Document. I understand that I may be subject to
9
penalties for contempt of Court if I violate this Order and
10
hereby consent to the jurisdiction of said Court for purposes of
11
enforcing this Order.
12
Dated: __________ /s/_____________________________”
13
This written requirement applies to, but is not limited to, expert witnesses and
14
other individuals and entities that may be employed or retained by the Receiving
15
Party’s counsel to assist in the preparation and/or the litigation of this action. The
16
Receiving Party shall be responsible for maintaining the signed original of each
17
such written statement until the conclusion of these proceedings, including any
18
appeal. Counsel for Receiving Parties shall insure that their office staff,
19
including, but not limited to, paralegals and secretaries, shall be made aware of
20
their obligations under this protective order.
21
18.
No waiver of objections. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order
22
constitutes any decision by the Court concerning discovery disputes or the
23
admission into evidence of any specific document or testimony or liability for
24
payment of any costs of production or reproduction of documents. This Order
25
also does not constitute a waiver by any party of any right to object to discovery
26
or admission into evidence of any document, record, testimony or other
27
information that is subject to this Order. Nor do Defendants waive any privileges,
28
including, but not limited to, the investigatory files or official information
7
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
privileges, see, e.g., Weiner v. FBI, 943 F. 2d 972, 985 (9th Cir. 1991), or Miller
2
v. Pancucci, 141 F.R.D. 292 (C.D. Cal. 1992), by entering into this order. By
3
signing this order Receiving Parties do not agree that any of these documents are
4
protected by any such privileges.
5
19.
Subpoena for Confidential Information. In the event that the
6
Receiving Party receives a subpoena, discovery request, or other legal process
7
seeking production of Confidential Information, the Receiving Party must give
8
prompt written notice to the Disclosing Party. The Receiving Party shall inform
9
the person or entity seeking the information of the existence of this Stipulation
10
and Order and shall not produce the Confidential Information absent a Court
11
Order requiring such production.
12
20.
Modification. For good cause, any party may seek a modification of
13
this Order, first by attempting to obtain the consent of the other parties to such
14
modification, and then, absent consent, by application to this Court.
15
21.
Return of Confidential Information. No more than thirty (30)
16
calendar days after the conclusion of this case the Receiving Party and every
17
other person and/or entity who received originals or copies of the Confidential
18
Information shall return all originals, copies of the Confidential Information, and
19
material derived therefrom, including, but not limited to, all log(s) of persons
20
authorized to review the protected documents and the written statement(s)
21
acknowledging the terms and provisions of this Order pursuant to Paragraph
22
No. 18 of this Order, to the Disclosing Party care of:
23
24
25
26
Dennis M. Gonzales, Esq.
Raymond W. Sakai, Esq.
Lawrence Beach Allen & Choi, PC
100 West Broadway, Suite 1200
Glendale, California 91210-1219
27
28
8
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Alternatively, the Receiving Party and every other person and/or entity
1
2
who received originals or copies of the Confidential Information may destroy all
3
such material and material derived therefrom within thirty (30) calendar days
4
after the conclusion of this case. Additionally, within thirty (30) calendar days
5
after the conclusion of this case, counsel for the Receiving Party shall send a
6
signed declaration stating that such material has been destroyed pursuant to this
7
Protective Order. This case has concluded when (i) a final judgment has been
8
entered by the Court or the case has otherwise been dismissed with prejudice; (ii)
9
the time for any objection to or request for reconsideration of such a judgment or
10
dismissal has expired; (iii) all available appeals have concluded or the time for
11
such appeals has expired; (iv) any post appeal proceedings have themselves
12
concluded; and (v) after payment of monies due, if any, to Plaintiff and/or their
13
attorneys, whether via judgment, settlement or otherwise. The Parties understand
14
that they have no control over documents in possession of the District Court and
15
Courts of Appeal. The Receiving Party has no obligation to obtain any such
16
Confidential Information that was filed with the court, or part of the trial of this
17
matter, other than filing documents in compliance with paragraph 16 or
18
Confidential Information returned by the Courts(s).
No more than thirty (30) calendar days after the conclusion of this case the
19
20
Receiving Party and every other person and/or entity who received originals or
21
copies of non-party City of Glendale’s Confidential Information shall destroy all
22
such material and notify the Glendale Records Bureau Administrator of the same.
Glendale Police Department
Records Bureau Administrator
131 North Isabel Street
Glendale, CA 91206
23
24
25
26
27
28
///
9
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
22.
Survivability Of This Protective Order. This Stipulation and
2
Protective Order shall survive the termination of this action, and the Court shall
3
retain jurisdiction to enforce it.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: June 19, 2014
8
______________________________
Honorable Carla Woehrle
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
BASSETT\PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?