Chanel Lemar v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Filing 47

FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. PROC. 54 AWARD OF COSTS IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS 34 , 45 By Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. This action be, and it hereby is, dismissed in its entirety against Defen dant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. with prejudice; 2. This action be, and it hereby is, dismissed in its entirety against Defendant Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. with prejudice; 3. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Defendan t Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. and against Plaintiff Chanel LeMar as to all claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint filed herein; and 4. Defendants, as the prevailing parties, are entitled to their costs under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and Local R ule 54. Within 14 days after entry of judgment, Defendants, as the prevailing parties, shall file and serve a completed Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs in compliance Local Rules 5-3 and 5-4.1. IT IS SO ORDERED.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

6

Douglas R. Hart, SBN 115673
[e-mail]
Jennifer B. Zargarof, SBN 204382
[e-mail]
Francis S. Lam, SBN 279076
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7

Attorneys for Defendants

1
2
3
4
5

E-FILED 5/11/15
JS-6

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

LOS ANGELES DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

CHANEL LEMAR, as an individual and )
on behalf of all others similarly situated, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., a Rhode Island
)
corporation; Garfield Beach CVS,
)
L.L.C., a California Corporation; and
)
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-01698-PSG-CW
Assigned to Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
UNDER FED. R. CIV. PROC. 54
AWARD OF COSTS IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ACTIVE 207461131v.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. (collectively,

2

“Defendants”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on February 23, 2015 on

3

Plaintiff Chanel LeMar’s First Amended Complaint. Dkt. #34. The Court found the

4

matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b).

5

After considering the papers submitted by the Parties, the Court issued an order

6

granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. #45. Therefore,

7

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

8

1.

9

Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. with prejudice;

This action be, and it hereby is, dismissed in its entirety against

10

2.

11

Defendant Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. with prejudice;

12

3.

13

and Defendant Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. and against Plaintiff Chanel LeMar

14

as to all claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint filed herein; and

15

4.

16

R. Civ. P. 54(d) and Local Rule 54. Within 14 days after entry of judgment,

17

Defendants, as the prevailing parties, shall file and serve a completed

18

“Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs” in compliance Local Rules 5-3 and 5-

19

4.1.

20
21
22
23

This action be, and it hereby is, dismissed in its entirety against

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Defendants, as the prevailing parties, are entitled to their costs under Fed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
5/11/15
Dated: _______________
__________________

_____________________________
Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
ACTIVE 207461131v.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT