Aldo Arevalo v. Fred Foulk
Filing
50
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 47 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendatio n of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that (1) denying Petitioner's motion for leave to amend and (2) directing that judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing the action with prejudice. (kl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
ALDO AREVALO,
Petitioner,
v.
FRED FOULK, Warden,
Respondent.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. CV 14-1983-CAS (AGR)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other
18
records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States
19
Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de
20
novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which
21
objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and
22
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
23
IT IS ORDERED that (1) denying Petitioner’s motion for leave to amend
24
and (2) directing that judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing the
25
action with prejudice.
26
27
28
DATED: May 30, 2017
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?