Carlos Ramirez v. David B. Long

Filing 50

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 48 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Respondents Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Claim Two; (2) Respondents Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Claims One and Three; and (3) Respondent shall file an Answer to Claims One and Three within thirty days of the date of this Order. (iva)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CARLOS RAMIREZ,
Petitioner,

12
13
14
15
16
17

v.
DAVID B. LONG,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 14-2008-JVS (KK)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has

18

reviewed the Second Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and

19

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and all records on file. The

20

Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is

2

GRANTED with respect to Claim Two; (2) Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is

3

DENIED with respect to Claims One and Three; and (3) Respondent shall file an

4

Answer to Claims One and Three within thirty days of the date of this Order.

5
6
7

DATED: March 1, 2016

______________________________________
HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2