Landry Boullard v. G. Swarthout
Filing
20
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge 8 19 . IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) respondents Motion to Dismiss is granted; (2) petitioners Request for Leave for Petitioners Motion for Stay and Abeyance is denied as moot; and (3) Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (nbo)
1
O
2
3
May 20, 2015
4
K
H
5
6
7
Petitioner
8
10
LANDRY BOULLARD,
12
13
14
Petitioner,
vs.
G. SWARTHOUT, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
klh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
5/20/15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 14-2031-GW (RNB)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative First Amended
Petition, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been
filed herein. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate
Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is
granted; (2) petitioner’s “Request for Leave for Petitioner’s Motion for Stay and
Abeyance” is denied as moot; and (3) Judgment be entered dismissing this action with
prejudice.
DATED: May 15, 2015
GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
2
JS-6
Entered
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
LANDRY BOULLARD,
13
Petitioner,
14
15
16
vs.
G. SWARTHOUT, Warden,
17
18
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 14-2031-GW (RNB)
JUDGMENT
19
20
21
22
Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United
States Magistrate Judge,
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice.
23
24
DATED: May 15, 2015
25
26
27
28
GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?