Cheryl C. Crowley v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO OPPOSE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Ameriprise's motion should not be granted. Plaintiff's response to this order to show cause must be filed no later than Friday, June 13, 2014, at 4:00 p.m. An appropriate response to this order will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition to Ameriprise's motion. Failure to respond to this motion may be deemed a failure to prosecute, resulting in dismissal of the entire lawsuit. See Chambers v. NASCO Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44 (1991). (rfi)

LINK:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

CV 14-02194 BRO (AGRx)

Title

CHERYL C. CROWLEY v. AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC., ET AL.

Date

June 10, 2014

Present: The Honorable

BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge

Renee A. Fisher

Not Present

N/A

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO OPPOSE
Pending before the Court is Defendant Ameriprise Financial Inc.’s motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 8.) When Ameriprise filed its motion, it set
the hearing date for June 30, 2014. (See id.) Under the Court’s Local Rule 7-9, a party
must oppose a motion at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. C.D. Cal. L.R.
7-9. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s opposition to Ameriprise’s motion was due no later than
June 9, 2014. Yet as of today, Plaintiff has filed no opposition. Pursuant to the Court’s
Local Rule 7-12, failure to file an opposition “may be deemed consent to the granting . . .
of the motion.” C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-12.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Ameriprise’s
motion should not be granted. Plaintiff’s response to this order to show cause must be
filed no later than Friday, June 13, 2014, at 4:00 p.m. An appropriate response to this
order will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiff’s failure to file an
opposition to Ameriprise’s motion. Failure to respond to this motion may be deemed a
failure to prosecute, resulting in dismissal of the entire lawsuit. See Chambers v. NASCO
Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44 (1991).

:

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

rf

Page 1 of 1