Albert Johnson v. Dependable Highway Express, Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION by Judge Margaret M. Morrow remanding case to LA Superior Court, Case number BC536340 Case Terminated. Made JS-6, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (ah)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 Farzad Rastegar (SBN: 155555) farzad@rastegarlawgroup.com Justin F. Marquez (SBN: 262417) justin@rastegarlawgroup.com RASTEGAR LAW GROUP, APC 1010 Crenshaw Blvd., Suite 100 Torrance, California 90501 Telephone: (310) 961-9600 Facsimile: (310) 961-9094 JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff ALBERT JOHNSON Michael A. Laurenson (SBN: 190023) mlaurenson@gordonrees.com Mark S. Posard (SBN: 208790) mposard@gordonrees.com GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendant DEPENDABLE HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. 15 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 16 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 17 18 18 ALBERT JOHNSON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 No. 2:14-CV-02238 MMM-JCGx [Hon. Margaret M. Morrow] CLASS ACTION vs. [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DEPENDABLE HIGHWAY EXPRESS, REMAND REMOVED ACTION INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 Case No. 2:14-CV-02238 ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION 1 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Remand Removed 2 Action, orders that this action is remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior 3 Court. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs with respect to the 4 removal and subsequent remand of this action. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 DATE: April 11, 2014 Honorable Margaret M. Morrow United States District Court Judge 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 1 ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION Case No. 2:14−cv−02214

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?