Albert Johnson v. Dependable Highway Express, Inc. et al
Filing
8
ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION by Judge Margaret M. Morrow remanding case to LA Superior Court, Case number BC536340 Case Terminated. Made JS-6, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (ah)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
Farzad Rastegar (SBN: 155555)
farzad@rastegarlawgroup.com
Justin F. Marquez (SBN: 262417)
justin@rastegarlawgroup.com
RASTEGAR LAW GROUP, APC
1010 Crenshaw Blvd., Suite 100
Torrance, California 90501
Telephone: (310) 961-9600
Facsimile: (310) 961-9094
JS-6
Attorneys for Plaintiff ALBERT
JOHNSON
Michael A. Laurenson (SBN: 190023)
mlaurenson@gordonrees.com
Mark S. Posard (SBN: 208790)
mposard@gordonrees.com
GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
Attorneys for Defendant
DEPENDABLE HIGHWAY
EXPRESS, INC.
15
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
16
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
17
18
18
ALBERT JOHNSON, individually, and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
No. 2:14-CV-02238 MMM-JCGx
[Hon. Margaret M. Morrow]
CLASS ACTION
vs.
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
DEPENDABLE HIGHWAY EXPRESS, REMAND REMOVED ACTION
INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
Case No. 2:14-CV-02238
ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION
1
The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Remand Removed
2
Action, orders that this action is remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior
3
Court. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs with respect to the
4
removal and subsequent remand of this action.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
DATE: April 11, 2014
Honorable Margaret M. Morrow
United States District Court Judge
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
1
ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION
Case No. 2:14−cv−02214
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?