United States of America v. $2,757,564.00 In U.S. Currency et al

Filing 62

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re: Stipulation for Protective Order 61 . (See document for complete details). (klg)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section VICTOR A. RODGERS California Bar No. 101281 Assistant United States Attorney Asset Forfeiture Section Federal Courthouse, 14th Floor 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2569 Facsimile: (213) 894-7177 E-mail: Victor.Rodgers@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 WESTERN DIVISON 15 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, Case No. CV 14-02320 FMO(AJWx) PROTECTIVE ORDER [Discovery Matter] v. $2,757,564.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY AND TWO ITEMS OF JEWELRY, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 JAVIER MARQUEZ, ROMELIA MARQUEZ, ABEL MARQUEZ, AND CYNTHIA VENCEBI, Claimants. 25 26 27 28 The Court’s having considered the stipulation of the parties with respect to the disclosure of information in 1 discovery in this matter and good cause appearing therefor, the 2 Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 3 1. The government may produce to the claimants discovery 4 in this matter that includes personal identification for others, 5 including but not limited to names, addresses, telephone 6 numbers, e-mail addresses, social security numbers, driver’s 7 license numbers, telephone numbers, dates of birth, bank account 8 numbers and other similar information, as well as financial 9 information, including bank records that contain personal 10 identifying information, including home addresses, Social 11 Security numbers, bank account numbers and other data 12 (collectively, “profile information”). 13 2. The government shall identify such information in 14 discovery by using the following designation on the documents, 15 on a diskette cover, or in an accompanying cover letter: 16 “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 17 3. Claimants and their counsel shall use documents that 18 are so designated only for the purposes of this case and shall 19 not disclose the documents to non-parties, except as needed for 20 the defense of the case, and only if the non-party agrees, in 21 writing, to be bound by the terms of a protective order 22 prohibiting the disclosure of the documents, or the confidential 23 information contained therein, to other third parties. 24 4. Within 90 days of the conclusion of this action 25 (including any appeals), claimants shall either (1) return all 26 designated documents to the government, as well as all copies 27 and all notes, memoranda, or other documents containing 28 confidential information obtained from the designated documents, 2 1 or (2) destroy the documents and certify in writing to counsel 2 for the government that the documents have been destroyed. 3 5. Absent a further order of the Court, designated 4 documents shall not be filed with or submitted to the Court, or 5 reproduced in any court filing, unless the documents are placed 6 under seal or all prior information or other personal 7 identifying information has been removed. 8 9 10 11 12 6. Prior to trial, no party shall disclose designated documents in open court without prior consideration by the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _08/17/2016 _____ 13 ______________ ____________ THE HONORABLE ANDREW J. WISTRICH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 Submitted By: 16 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United states Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 /s/ Victor A. Rodgers _ VICTOR A. RODGERS Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?