United States of America v. $2,757,564.00 In U.S. Currency et al
Filing
62
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re: Stipulation for Protective Order 61 . (See document for complete details). (klg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
STEVEN R. WELK
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section
VICTOR A. RODGERS
California Bar No. 101281
Assistant United States Attorney
Asset Forfeiture Section
Federal Courthouse, 14th Floor
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-2569
Facsimile: (213) 894-7177
E-mail:
Victor.Rodgers@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
WESTERN DIVISON
15
16
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
Case No. CV 14-02320 FMO(AJWx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
[Discovery Matter]
v.
$2,757,564.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
AND TWO ITEMS OF JEWELRY,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
JAVIER MARQUEZ, ROMELIA
MARQUEZ, ABEL MARQUEZ, AND
CYNTHIA VENCEBI,
Claimants.
25
26
27
28
The Court’s having considered the stipulation of the
parties with respect to the disclosure of information in
1
discovery in this matter and good cause appearing therefor, the
2
Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
3
1.
The government may produce to the claimants discovery
4
in this matter that includes personal identification for others,
5
including but not limited to names, addresses, telephone
6
numbers, e-mail addresses, social security numbers, driver’s
7
license numbers, telephone numbers, dates of birth, bank account
8
numbers and other similar information, as well as financial
9
information, including bank records that contain personal
10
identifying information, including home addresses, Social
11
Security numbers, bank account numbers and other data
12
(collectively, “profile information”).
13
2.
The government shall identify such information in
14
discovery by using the following designation on the documents,
15
on a diskette cover, or in an accompanying cover letter:
16
“CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.”
17
3.
Claimants and their counsel shall use documents that
18
are so designated only for the purposes of this case and shall
19
not disclose the documents to non-parties, except as needed for
20
the defense of the case, and only if the non-party agrees, in
21
writing, to be bound by the terms of a protective order
22
prohibiting the disclosure of the documents, or the confidential
23
information contained therein, to other third parties.
24
4.
Within 90 days of the conclusion of this action
25
(including any appeals), claimants shall either (1) return all
26
designated documents to the government, as well as all copies
27
and all notes, memoranda, or other documents containing
28
confidential information obtained from the designated documents,
2
1
or (2) destroy the documents and certify in writing to counsel
2
for the government that the documents have been destroyed.
3
5.
Absent a further order of the Court, designated
4
documents shall not be filed with or submitted to the Court, or
5
reproduced in any court filing, unless the documents are placed
6
under seal or all prior information or other personal
7
identifying information has been removed.
8
9
10
11
12
6.
Prior to trial, no party shall disclose designated
documents in open court without prior consideration by the
Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _08/17/2016 _____
13
______________
____________
THE HONORABLE ANDREW J. WISTRICH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
Submitted By:
16
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON
Assistant United states Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
STEVEN R. WELK
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
/s/ Victor A. Rodgers
_
VICTOR A. RODGERS
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?