Kirk Erichsen et al v. County of Orange et al

Filing 543

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiffs shall take nothing way of their first amended complaint against Defendants. Said Defendants shall recover from Plaintiffs their costs of suit incurred in this proceeding, and this is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

KIRK ERICHSEN, an individual;
KRYSTAL ERICHSEN, an individual;
Z.E., a minor, A.E. a minor by and
through their guardian ad litem
PAULINE CLAY HUNTER,

14

Plaintiffs,

15

v.

16

CASE NO:
LA CV14-2357-JAK (SSx)
JUDGMENT
JS-6

COUNTY OF ORANGE; et al.,

17

Defendants.

18
19

On August 4, 2017, the Court GRANTED the motion for an order

20

dismissing the action and/or for terminating sanctions filed by Defendants County

21

of Orange, Orange County Social Services Agency, Michael Riley (Retired),

22
23
24

Wallace Miller, Gary King, Curtis Vaughn, Jill Bright, Debbie Nita, Maureen
Naganuma (collectively the “County Defendants”), the City of Tustin, Tustin
Police Department, Scott Jordan (Retired), and Det. Ryan Coe (collectively the

25

“City Defendants”) [Dkts. 314, 315], joined by Defendants Orangewood
26

Children’s Foundation (“Orangewood”) [Dkt. 325], Equity Residential (“Equity”)
27
28

[Dkt. 336], the Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) [Dkt. 358], the Law

`

1

Firm Defendants [Dkt. 359] and Tracy Vander Haden, Molly Murphy and the

2

Tustin Unified School District (collectively the “School District Defendants”)

3

[Dkt. 369], and the motion to dismiss the amended complaint for violating court

4

orders and for failure to prosecute filed by Defendants Linda M. O’Neil and Law

5

Offices of Harold LaFlamme (collectively the “Law Firm Defendants”) [Dkt. 326,

6

327], joined by Orangewood [Dkt. 466]. The Order dismissed the action with

7
8

prejudice and awarded monetary sanctions in the amount of $7,500 against
Plaintiffs and attorney Chandler Parker, in favor of the County/City Defendants;

9

On August 4, 2017, the Court DENIED Plaintiffs’ motion for partial
10

summary judgment [Dkts. 351, 355, 526];
11

On August 4, 2017, the Court GRANTED in their entirety the motions for
12
13
14

summary judgment/partial summary judgment brought by the County Defendants
[Dkt. 343, 344], the City Defendants [Dkt. 316], Defendant Orangewood [Dkt.

15

312, 388], Defendant Equity [Dkt. 329], Defendant LAPD [Dkt. 333, 379], the

16

Law Firm Defendants [Dkt. 340], and the School District Defendants [Dkt. 319],

17

and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE the entire action.

18

All claims having been adjudicated in favor of All Defendants,

19

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND

20

DECREED:

21

Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their first amended complaint against

22

Defendants. Said Defendants shall recover from Plaintiffs their costs of suit

23

incurred in this proceeding, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 23, 2017
____________________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28