Veronica J. Rowe v. Randall D. Naiman et al

Filing 42

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than October 2, 2017, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No hear ing will be held. In their response, Plaintiff should address the following issue in addition to any other issues they deem appropriate: (1) Why Plaintiff has failed to timely file a 90-day status report, as required by the Court's Order of August 15, 2014. (See ECF No. 22.) Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in dismissal of the case. (smo)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL No. CV 14-02498-ODW (SHx) Title Veronica J. Rowe v. Randall D. Naiman, ESQ, et al. Present: The Honorable Date September 1, 2017 Otis D. Wright, II, United States District Judge Sheila English Not reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not present Not present Proceedings: In Chambers The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than October 2, 2017, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. In their response, Plaintiff should address the following issue in addition to any other issues they deem appropriate: (1) Why Plaintiff has failed to timely file a 90-day status report, as required by the Court’s Order of August 15, 2014. (See ECF No. 22.) Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in dismissal of the case. : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL 00 SE Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?