Veronica J. Rowe v. Randall D. Naiman et al
Filing
42
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than October 2, 2017, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No hear ing will be held. In their response, Plaintiff should address the following issue in addition to any other issues they deem appropriate: (1) Why Plaintiff has failed to timely file a 90-day status report, as required by the Court's Order of August 15, 2014. (See ECF No. 22.) Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in dismissal of the case. (smo)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
No.
CV 14-02498-ODW (SHx)
Title
Veronica J. Rowe v. Randall D. Naiman, ESQ, et al.
Present: The Honorable
Date
September 1, 2017
Otis D. Wright, II, United States District Judge
Sheila English
Not reported
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not present
Not present
Proceedings:
In Chambers
The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than
October 2, 2017, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No hearing
will be held. In their response, Plaintiff should address the following issue in addition to any
other issues they deem appropriate:
(1) Why Plaintiff has failed to timely file a 90-day status report, as required by the
Court’s Order of August 15, 2014. (See ECF No. 22.)
Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in dismissal of the case.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
00
SE
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?