P.S.I. Plumbing v. Pacific Indeminity Company et al

Filing 13

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Upon Stipulation 12 , IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint against Allen Engineering Contractor, Inc., a California Corporation, i& hereby dismissed. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

DAVID M. SINE, State Bar #80673
SANRORN & SINE
2 5199 E Pacific Coast H’ ghway, Ste 501
i
Long Beach, CA .90804-3334
I

3
4
5
6

Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs:
United. States of America, for the Use
and Benefit of P.S.I. Plumbing

7

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

12
13

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA For
the Use and Benefit Of P.S.I.
PLUMBING, a California
Corporation,
Plaintiffs,

14
15

I Case No..: 2:14-cv-02532 CBM-JEMx
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL

VS.

18

PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY,
a Wisconsin Corporation Authorized
and Registered to Conduct Business in
California; ALLEN ENGINEERING
CONTRACTOR, INC., a California
Corporation,

19

Defendants.

16
17.

20
21
22

Now having reviewed the Stipulation of Dismissal by and between plaintiff

23

United States of American For the Use and Benefit of P.S.I. Plumbing, a California

24

Corporation through its attorneys of record Sanborn & Sine by David M. Sine, and

25

Allen Engineering Contractor, Inc., a California:CorporatiOn through its attorneys of

26

record Bruckner Law Firm by William L Bruckner, and Good Cause Appearing,

27
28
1.

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint against Allen Engineering Contractor,

1

2

Inc., a California Corporation, is hereby dismissed.

3
4
5
6

Date:

/

/1
Judge, United States District cow

7
8
9
10
11

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
10
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL