Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Dreams Footwear, Inc. et al
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing by Tuesday, June 24, 2014, why it has not moved for entry of default against Dreams Footwear. No hearing will be held; Plaintiff shall respond in writing. The Court will discharge this Order upon a timely application for entry of default filed with the Clerk of Court. Failure to timely respond will result in dismissal for lack of prosecution. (lc)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
United States District Court
Central District of California
6
7
8
9
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION, Case No. 2:14-cv-02649-ODW(PLAx)
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE.
12
DREAMS FOOTWEAR, INC.; FRANK
13
CHEN; DOES 1–10, inclusive,
14
LACK OF PROSECUTION
Defendants.
15
On April 25, 2014, Plaintiff served Defendant Dreams Footwear, Inc. (ECF
16
No. 11.) Dreams Footwear therefore had until May 16, 2014, to answer or otherwise
17
respond—that is, 21 days after the service date. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). To
18
date, Dreams Footwear has filed no response. The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff
19
to SHOW CAUSE in writing by Tuesday, June 24, 2014, why it has not moved for
20
entry of default against Dreams Footwear. No hearing will be held; Plaintiff shall
21
respond in writing. The Court will discharge this Order upon a timely application for
22
entry of default filed with the Clerk of Court. Failure to timely respond will result in
23
dismissal for lack of prosecution.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
June 17, 2014
26
27
28
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
