Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Dreams Footwear, Inc. et al
Filing
22
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: List of Deckers Cases:2:14-cv-02561-ODW(CWx); 2:14-cv-02565-ODW(MANx); 2:14-cv-02577-ODW(CWx); 2:14-cv-02649-ODW(PLAx). The low-number case, Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Sears Holdings Corp. et al., No. 2:14-cv-02561-ODW(CWx) (C.D. Cal. case filed Apr. 4, 2014), will serve as the master case file.This Order does not constitute a determination that these actions should be consolidated for trial, nor does it have the effect of making any entity a party to an action in which it has not been joined and served in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All orders, pleadings, motions, and other documents will, when filed and docketed in the master case file, be deemed filed and dock eted in each individual related case to the extent applicable. Parties shall enter their appearances in the individual cases, and the Clerk is directed to add all parties and attorneys from the individual cases to the master case file such that all c ounsel appearing in the individual cases will receive notifications for the master case file as well. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS ) The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to immediately serve a copy of this order on all Defendants who have not yet filed appearances in the cases (and who therefore have not received a copy through the CM/ECF system). (lc) .Modified on 7/7/2014 (lc).
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION, Lead Case CV 14-02561-ODW(CWx)
Plaintiff,
12
2:14-cv-02565-ODW(MANx)
v.
13
ALL CASES
14
SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION;
2:14-cv-02577-ODW(CWx)
15
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.; SEARS
2:14-cv-02649-ODW(PLAx) -*
16
BRANDS, LLC; DOES 1–10, inclusive,
Defendants.
17
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES
18
This Consolidation Order applies to, and shall be filed in, all of the cases listed
19
in Part IV below (the “Deckers Cases”), which were filed by Plaintiff Deckers
20
Outdoor Corporation and include claims for infringement of United States patents
21
D599,999 and D616,189. This Order applies to any cases subsequently filed by
22
Deckers alleging infringement of the same patents that are assigned to this Court.
23
I.
Relation and coordination of cases
24
The Deckers Cases are deemed related within the meaning of General Order 08-
25
05, section 5; and Local Rule 83-1.3 because they will call for determination of the
26
same and substantially similar questions of law or fact, will entail substantial
27
duplication of labor if heard by different judges, and involve the same patents. The
28
Deckers Cases are, until further order, coordinated for case-management purposes
1
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42. The Court will issue one scheduling order
2
to govern all of the cases.
3
This Order does not constitute a determination that these actions should be
4
consolidated for trial, nor does it have the effect of making any entity a party to an
5
action in which it has not been joined and served in accordance with the Federal Rules
6
of Civil Procedure.
7
The low-number case, Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Sears Holdings Corp. et al.,
8
No. 2:14-cv-02561-ODW(CWx) (C.D. Cal. case filed Apr. 4, 2014), will serve as the
9
master case file. All orders, pleadings, motions, and other documents will, when filed
10
and docketed in the master case file, be deemed filed and docketed in each individual
11
related case to the extent applicable. Parties shall enter their appearances in the
12
individual cases, and the Clerk is directed to add all parties and attorneys from the
13
individual cases to the master case file such that all counsel appearing in the
14
individual cases will receive notifications for the master case file as well.
15
If orders, pleadings, motions, or other documents are generally applicable to all
16
consolidated actions, they shall include in their caption the notation that they relate to
17
“ALL CASES” and be filed and docketed only in the master file. Documents
18
intended to apply only to particular cases will indicate in their caption the case number
19
of the case(s) to which they apply and will only be filed in the individual cases.
20
II.
Discovery
21
A.
Generally
22
Pursuant to the Court’s Patent Standing Order, the Court hereby REFERS all
23
discovery matters to this Court for all purposes.
24
representations made to the contrary in the Court’s Scheduling and Case Management
25
Order. This Order likewise supersedes Central District of California Local Rule 37 in
26
its entirety.
All discovery responses must be verified.
27
28
///
2
This Order supersedes any
1
The Court will handle all discovery disputes in the form of letter briefs, which
2
shall be electronically filed as a “Notice of Discovery Dispute.” For the purposes of
3
discovery letter briefs governed by this Patent Discovery Order only, the parties may
4
disregard any automatically generated Notice to Filer of Deficiencies invoking Local
5
Rule 11’s formatting rules or Local Rule 83-2.11’s prohibition on communications
6
with the judge via letter. The moving party shall fully comply with both the letter and
7
the spirit of Local Rule 7-3 and 37-1’s meet-and-confer requirements prior to
8
submitting its opening letter brief. The parties are further encouraged to review
9
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(5)(A) carefully before submitting any discovery
10
briefs.
11
Upon the filing of the opening letter brief, the opposing party shall have 7 days
12
to file a responding letter brief. The parties’ opening and responding letter briefs shall
13
not exceed 5 single-spaced pages, excluding declarations and exhibits. Both briefs
14
shall succinctly state each side’s position on the dispute. The Court will not accept
15
any reply briefs.
16
In lieu of holding a hearing on discovery matters, the Court will schedule a
17
teleconference for as soon as practicable following the Court’s receipt of the opposing
18
party’s responding letter brief.
19
B.
Coordination and discovery limitation
20
The Court intends to actively manage this case in order to conserve the
21
resources of all parties and to focus effort on key issues. The Court notes that the
22
attached case-management schedule assumes one trial.
23
coordinated, but the Court will only join Defendants for trial if such consolidation will
24
facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of the actions and the criteria of
25
35 U.S.C. § 299 are met. A further case-management conference will be held after the
26
Court issues its Markman order to re-evaluate these dates as necessary.
27
///
28
///
3
These actions are being
The Court will require efficient coordinated discovery practice. The parties
1
2
shall confer and attempt to agree on limitations that reflect coordination.
For
3
example, on common issues, Plaintiff's witnesses should not, in most instances, be
4
separately deposed in every case. Rather, a combined multi-day deposition would be
5
appropriate, scheduled for enough time to cover all Defendants’ individual issues,
6
with common issues handled in a coordinated and nonduplicative manner. The Court
7
anticipates that, subject to confidentiality restrictions, all depositions of Plaintiff’s
8
witnesses shall be cross-noticed for, and may be used in, every case. The parties are
9
encouraged to cross-notice depositions of defense witnesses where appropriate. The
10
parties should agree on a number of common discovery requests to be served on
11
Plaintiff, with a small number of additional requests for each Defendant. Likewise,
12
the parties should explore whether it would be feasible to reduce the default number of
13
discovery requests to be served on each Defendant.
14
Defendants are encouraged to coordinate their positions to the maximum extent
15
possible and not present Plaintiff or the Court with multiple proposals on scheduling
16
and coordination of discovery unless there are truly insoluble conflicts among the
17
defendants. Defendants are encouraged to form working groups, perhaps organized
18
by issue, to assist in the coordination of these actions and the presentation of a
19
cohesive Defense position to the extent possible.
20
III.
Service of this Order
21
The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to immediately serve a copy of this order on all
22
Defendants who have not yet filed appearances in the cases (and who therefore have
23
not received a copy through the CM/ECF system).
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
4
1
IV.
List of Deckers Cases
2
2:14-cv-02561-ODW(CWx)
3
2:14-cv-02565-ODW(MANx)
4
2:14-cv-02577-ODW(CWx)
5
2:14-cv-02649-ODW(PLAx)
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
July 3, 2014
9
10
11
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?