Stoll, Nussbaum & Polakov v. Bradley H. Kane

Filing 85

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. All claims and counterclaims asserted in this action against all parties tothis action shall be dismissed with prejudice. 2. Each party shall bear their own costs of suit and attorneys' fees. 3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties' settlement. SO ORDERED.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)

Download PDF
1 2 June 20, 2016 3 VC P June 20, 2016 VC P 4 5 6 JS-6 7 8 9 STOLL, NUSSBAUM & POLAKOV, Plaintiff, 10 11 Case No. CV14-2690-SJO-VBK JUDGMENT v. 12 13 BRADLEY H. KANE, Defendant. 14 15 BRADLEY H. KANE, 16 Counter-Claimant, 17 18 v. 19 STOLL, NUSSBAUM & POLAKOV, 20 A Professional Corporation, and 21 ROBERT STOLL, JR., An Individual, 22 Counter-Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 On June 7, 2016, the above-entitled action came on for trial before this Court. In 2 lieu of proceeding with trial, plaintiff and counter-defendant Stoll, Nussbaum & 3 Polakov and counter-defendant Robert Stoll, Jr., on the one hand, and defendant and 4 counter-claimant Bradley H. Kane, on the other hand, reached a binding settlement to 5 resolve this litigation, the specific terms of which were placed on the record with the 6 Court and are incorporated herein by this reference. 7 Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 8 1. 9 All claims and counterclaims asserted in this action against all parties to this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. 10 2. Each party shall bear their own costs of suit and attorneys’ fees. 11 3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement. 12 13 SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: June 20, 2016 16 17 18 _____ ______________________ HON. S. JAMES OTERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?