Abdul Aslami v. Nichia America Corporation et al

Filing 26

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order 23 : NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT: (see attached) (jm)

Download PDF
1 Laura C. Hess (SBN 198284) lhess@kringandchung.com 2 Allyson K. Thompson (SBN 235933) athompson@kringandchung.com 3 KRING & CHUNG, LLP 38 Corporate Park 4 Irvine, California 92606-5105 Telephone: (949) 261-7700 5 Facsimile: (949) 261-8800 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff ABDUL ASLAMI 7 R. CHRISTOPHER CATALDO (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ccataldo@jaffelaw.com 8 PATRICE S. AREND (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) parend@jaffelaw.com 9 JAFFE RAITT HEUER & WEISS, P.C. 10 27777 Franklin Road, Suite 2500 Southfield, Michigan 48034 11 Telephone: (248) 351-3000 Facsimile: (248) 351-3082 12 LARRY C. DRAPKIN (SBN 98771) lcd@msk.com 13 JOLENE KONNERSMAN (SBN 217574) jrk@msk.com 14 BRIAN M. RAGEN (SBN 275045) byr@msk.com 15 MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP 16 11377 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90064-1683 17 Telephone: (310) 312-2000 Facsimile: (310) 312-3100 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 18 Attorneys for Defendant 19 NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 ABDUL ASLAMI, Plaintiff, 23 24 Case No. CV 14-2785 JAK (FFMx) v. 25 NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation; and 26 DOES 1 to 20, inclusive, 27 Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Judge: The Hon. John A. Kronstadt File Date: April 11, 2014 Trial Date: Not yet set Defendants. 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the agreement between Abdul Aslami (Plaintiff), and Nichia 3 America Corporation (“Defendant”) (collectively, Plaintiff and Defendant are 4 referred to together as the “Parties” and each as a “Party”) and approval of the 5 Court, this Stipulated Protective Order (“Protective Order”) shall govern the 6 production of confidential documents, deposition testimony, discovery and other 7 information produced in this action. 8 9 10 1. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), good cause exists for entry of this 11 Protective Order because the Parties to this action: (1) have sought and expect to 12 seek and disclose in the future certain Confidential Information, as defined herein, 13 in this action; (2) believe that unrestricted disclosure or dissemination of such 14 Confidential Information will cause injury to their business, commercial and/or 15 privacy interests; (3) desire an efficient and practical means to designate such 16 information as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 17 EYES ONLY and thereby help ensure its continued protection against unwarranted 18 disclosure or dissemination; and (4) have agreed to such means as set forth herein. 19 20 21 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 As used herein, the term “Confidential Information” shall 22 mean: (a) any type of information that has not been made generally available to 23 the public and the disclosure of which the disclosing Party or third party contends 24 would cause serious harm to the disclosing Party’s or third party’s business 25 operations or other interests, including, but not limited to, contracts for goods or 26 services, customer lists, customer data, costs of goods or services sold, 27 manufacturing or other costs of doing business, employee salaries, employee Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 personnel materials, employee health or medical records, marketing plans, 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 financial performance data, sales records, inventory sheets, and manufacturing, 2 product development, and business development strategies; (b) data derived from 3 such Confidential Information, including any summaries, compilations, quotes, or 4 paraphrases thereof; (c) any other oral, written, or recorded material that consists 5 of or contains trade secrets (as defined in California Civil Code § 3426.1(d)) or 6 other confidential research, development, or commercial information (as referred 7 to in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G)); or (d) any other information that the designating 8 Party reasonably believes (1) constitutes proprietary information, confidential 9 business information, information that the designating Party may need, for any 10 business, employment or competitive purposes, to be protected from disclosure, 11 trade secrets, and/or information in which the Party or any third party has a privacy 12 interest, or (2) is subject to protection from disclosure, or limitation upon 13 disclosure, under applicable law. 14 2.2 As used herein, the terms “Document” and “Documents,” mean 15 all documents, writings, tangible things, recordings, and photographs as defined in 16 Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a) and Fed. R. Evid. 1001, and include, but are not limited to, 17 records, exhibits, reports, samples, transcripts, video or audio recordings, disks, 18 affidavits, briefs, summaries, notes, abstracts, drawings, company records and 19 reports, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, and 20 motions, including copies or computer-stored versions of any of the foregoing. 21 2.3 As used herein, “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 22 means Confidential Information that the designating Party reasonably believes 23 requires for its protection that it not be disclosed to the adverse Party. 24 2.4 As used herein, the term “Protected Material” means any 25 Confidential Information that has been designated by a Party or third party as 26 “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 27 Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 2 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3. DESIGNATION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 3.1 This Protective Order applies to all initial disclosures, discovery 3 responses, Documents and other information or materials containing Confidential 4 Information disclosed in this action that are designated by a Party or third party as 5 CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, 6 whether such disclosure is by order of the Court or by response to questions in a 7 deposition, written interrogatories, requests for the production of Documents and 8 other tangible things, requests for admission, subpoenas to third parties, or any 9 other discovery or disclosure undertaken in this action. 10 3.2 Such designation shall be accomplished by placing the notation 11 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 12 ONLY” on every page of each Document or portion thereof so designated. In the 13 case of Confidential Information disclosed in a non-paper medium (e.g., videotape, 14 audiotape, computer disks, etc.), the appropriate notation shall be affixed to the 15 outside of the medium or its container so as to clearly give notice of the 16 designation. Such designation is deemed to apply to the Document itself and to the 17 Confidential Information contained therein. 18 3.3 Protected Material shall be used only for the purposes of this 19 litigation and may not be used by any Party to whom or which that information is 20 produced or disclosed for research, development, sales, marketing, publicity, or 21 competitive purposes, or any other purpose. Protected Material shall not be 22 disclosed to anyone other than those persons identified in Paragraphs 5.3 and 5.4, 23 infra, except as may be ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing by the Parties. 24 3.4 The Parties and any third parties responding to discovery in this 25 action shall use reasonable care to avoid designating any Documents or other 26 materials as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 27 EYES ONLY that are: (a) not entitled to such designation, or (b) generally Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 available to the public. 3 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 4. DEPOSITIONS 4.1 With respect to the examination of witnesses upon oral 3 deposition, when Protected Material is supplied to the deponent, or when the 4 deponent’s testimony contains, reflects, or comments on Protected Material, the 5 deposition reporter and/or videographer shall be informed of this Protective Order 6 by the Party or third party seeking to invoke its protection, and shall place on the 7 cover of any deposition transcript or video that contains any Protected Material the 8 words “CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO A 9 COURT PROTECTIVE ORDER.” Counsel for the Parties then shall take 10 appropriate steps to prevent any portions of any deposition transcript or videotape 11 designated CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 12 EYES ONLY from being disclosed to any person, except as provided in this 13 Protective Order. 14 4.2 Testimony at a deposition may be designated CONFIDENTIAL 15 or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY if this Protective 16 Order is invoked at the deposition by counsel for a Party or the counsel for a third 17 party deponent. The designating Party or third party also may, within a reasonable 18 time after receiving a copy of the deposition transcript, provide all Parties with a 19 written list of the page(s) of the deposition transcript, and any exhibits attached 20 thereto, that the Party or third party designates as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY 21 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. 22 4.3 If Protected Material is to be discussed or disclosed in a 23 deposition, any Party or third party claiming such confidentiality may exclude 24 from the room any person who is not entitled to receive such Confidential 25 Information during that portion of the deposition in which the Confidential 26 Information is actually discussed or disclosed. If Protected Material is to be 27 discussed or disclosed at a hearing or at trial, the Parties may request that the Court Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 exclude from the courtroom any person who is not entitled to receive such 4 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Confidential Information during that portion of the hearing or trial in which the 2 Confidential Information is actually discussed or disclosed. 3 4 5 5. DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 The Parties, counsel for the Parties, and all persons who view 6 Protected Material shall maintain all information designated as CONFIDENTIAL 7 or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY in confidence and 8 shall not disclose such information, directly or indirectly, to any person except as 9 provided in this Protective Order. 10 5.2 While the disclosure of Protected Material to persons not 11 authorized by this Protective Order could, by definition, be prejudicial to the 12 business, operations, or interests of the designating Party or third party, the 13 CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY 14 designations should not be overused. 15 5.3 Access to Confidential Information designated as 16 CONFIDENTIAL shall be limited to the following persons: 17 5.3.1 Outside counsel of record and in-house counsel for the 18 Parties (together with and their support personnel and outside contractors services 19 who are working on this litigation under the direction of such attorneys). 20 5.3.2 Expert witnesses and/or consultants (together with their 21 support personnel) retained by counsel of record on behalf of the Parties for 22 purposes of this litigation who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement 23 to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 24 5.3.3 Pursuant to Paragraphs 4.1 through 4.3, supra, deponents 25 who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that is 26 attached hereto as Exhibit A. Counsel should have a good faith belief that such 27 disclosure is necessary before disclosing Confidential Information to the deponent. Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 5 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5.3.4 Court reporter(s), videographers, and their staff engaged 1 2 in this litigation. 5.3.5 The Parties to this action, as well as officers, directors, 3 4 and employees of the Parties to this action that are corporate entities who have 5 signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached 6 hereto as Exhibit A. 5.3.6 Any court-appointed or private neutral used in settlement 7 8 proceedings in this action (together with their support personnel). 5.3.7 The Court and its personnel. 9 10 5.4 Access to Confidential Information designated as HIGHLY 11 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY shall be limited to the 12 following persons: 13 5.4.1 Outside counsel of record and in-house counsel for the 14 Parties (together with and their support personnel and outside contractors services 15 who are working on this litigation under the direction of such attorneys). 16 5.4.2 Expert witnesses and/or consultants (together with their 17 support personnel) retained by counsel of record on behalf of the Parties for 18 purposes of this litigation who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement 19 to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 20 5.4.3 Pursuant to Paragraphs 4.1 through 4.3, supra, deponents 21 who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that is 22 attached hereto as Exhibit A. Counsel should have a good faith belief that such 23 disclosure is necessary before disclosing Confidential Information to the deponent. 24 5.4.4 Court reporter(s), videographers, and their staff engaged 25 in this litigation. 26 5.4.5 Any court-appointed or private neutral used in settlement 27 proceedings in this action (together with their support personnel). Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 5.4.6 The Court and its personnel. 6 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 6. CHALLENGING A DESIGNATION 6.1 2 A Party which disputes the propriety of a designation may shall 3 challenge such designation at any within a reasonable time after the materials are 4 so designated. (FFM) In the event that a Party challenges such designation, the 5 Party shall provide written notice to the designating Party explaining the basis for 6 its disagreement with the designation. The Parties shall first attempt to resolve the 7 dispute in good faith and shall employ the procedures of Local Rules 37-1 through 8 37-4 to resolve that dispute. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the receiving Party 9 may apply to the Court for a ruling concerning the status of such material, and, 10 pending such application and ruling, the receiving Party shall treat such material as 11 Protected Material under this Protective Order. Upon any hearing, the burden of 12 proving that material has been properly designated is on the Party making such 13 designation. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 14 harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other Parties) may expose 15 the challenging Party to sanctions. 6.2 16 For Documents that any Party might wish to file with the Court 17 under seal, that Party shall employ the procedures of Local Rule 79-5.1 and 18 comply with the requirements of Section 10, infra. 6.3 19 No Party shall be obligated to challenge the propriety of a 20 designation, and a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent attack on the 21 propriety of any other designation. 22 23 24 7. FAILURE TO DESIGNATE 7.1 If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified 25 Confidential Information does not, standing alone, waive the designating Party’s or 26 third party’s right to secure protection under this Protective Order for such 27 Confidential Information. Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 7 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 7.2 1 Upon timely correction of a designation, the receiving Party 2 must make reasonable efforts to assure that the designated Protected Material is 3 treated in accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order. 4 5 8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE 8.1 6 If a Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has 7 disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized 8 under this Protective Order, it must immediately (a) notify in writing the 9 designating Party or third party of the unauthorized disclosure, (b) use its best 10 efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the 11 person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of 12 this Protective Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the 13 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit 14 A. 15 16 9. 17 CUSTODY AND DISPOSITION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 9.1 Protected Material shall be maintained in the custody of counsel 18 for the Parties, except for information in the custody of: (a) the Court; (b) any 19 court reporter transcribing testimony given in this action, for the limited purpose of 20 rendering his or her normal transcribing services; and (c) consultants or experts 21 entitled to see such information under the terms of this Protective Order, to the 22 extent necessary for their study, analysis, and preparation of the case. Except for 23 the Court, a person with custody of Protected Material shall maintain it in a manner 24 that limits access to it to only those persons entitled under this Protective Order to 25 examine it. 26 9.2 Unless counsel agree otherwise in writing, within sixty (60) 27 days of the conclusion of this litigation, whether by settlement and dismissal or Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 final, non-appealable decision of the Court, the Parties, counsel for the Parties, and 8 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 all other persons who are in possession of Protected Material agree that they will 2 (a) destroy or return to the producing Party or third party all hard copy Documents, 3 other than attorney work product, containing Protected Material produced by a 4 Party or third party; and (b) delete all electronically stored Documents, other than 5 attorney work product, containing Protected Material produced by a Party or third 6 party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties shall not have any obligation 7 under this Protective Order to ensure the destruction of any copies of 8 electronically-stored Protected Material made by the automatic processes of their 9 computer systems, including but not limited to any such copies that may reside on 10 their servers and/or backup tapes. 9.3 11 Notwithstanding the foregoing, counsel of record and each 12 Party shall be permitted to retain a file copy of all pre-trial, trial, and post-trial 13 materials, discovery, depositions and deposition exhibits, and Document databases. 14 Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require any Party to return or 15 destroy work product or attorney client privileged communications, whether from 16 or to outside or in-house counsel. Such file copies must be maintained under the 17 conditions of maintaining confidentiality as set forth in Paragraph 8.1, supra. 18 19 20 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 10.1 Except as otherwise set forth in Paragraphs 10.2-10.4 9.2-9.4 21 (FFM) regarding the introduction and use of Confidential Information at trial and 22 by the Court, and as may be required by law or legal process, the obligations of 23 confidentiality and nondisclosure shall be effective and shall be respected by the 24 Parties and all persons in any way involved in these proceedings or to whose 25 attention Confidential Information shall come unless and until otherwise ordered 26 by the Court or stipulated by all Parties to this action. These obligations of 27 confidentiality and nondisclosure shall bind all such persons through all Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 proceedings in this action, except trial, including all appeals, arbitrations, and 9 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 proceedings upon remand, and shall survive the conclusion of this action unless 2 and until otherwise ordered by the Court, or until the Parties to this action stipulate 3 that Protected Material can be disclosed. 4 10.2 This Protective Order shall not apply to trial proceedings. 5 However, in advance of or during trial, any Party may move the Court to maintain 6 the confidentiality of any Document or information governed by this Protective 7 Order or seek a protective order with respect to testimony containing Confidential 8 Information that may be offered at trial or specific Documents containing 9 Confidential Information that may be marked as exhibits at trial in order to ensure 10 the confidentiality of such information. 11 10.3 In general, court orders are available to the public. To the 12 extent that a Party refers to or relies upon material that is filed under seal in its 13 pleadings, the pleadings must request that specific information be kept confidential 14 in the court’s order. Absent the granting of such advance request, the Court may 15 incorporate all evidence in its written and oral rulings. 16 10.4 By entering into this Protective Order, no Party or third party 17 waives any objections it might have to the production of Documents or information 18 covered by this Protective Order. 19 10.5 No Party to this action, by entering into this Protective Order, 20 by designating certain information as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY 21 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, or by failing to object to any 22 other Party’s such designation, shall be deemed to have admitted or agreed that any 23 such designated information is, in fact, private, a trade secret or other confidential 24 research, development, or commercial information. 25 10.6 The Court retains jurisdiction even after termination of this 26 action to enforce this Protective Order and to make such deletions from or 27 amendments, modifications, and additions to the Protective Order that the Court Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 may from time to time deem appropriate. The Parties hereto reserve all rights to 10 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 apply to the Court at any time, before or after termination of this action, for an 2 order modifying this Protective Order or seeking further protection against 3 disclosure or use of claimed Confidential Information. 4 5 11. FILING OR LODGING UNDER SEAL 11.1 Without written permission from the designating Party or third 6 7 party, or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a 8 Party may not file any Protected Material in the public record. Such materials shall 9 be submitted to the Court in accordance with the procedures set forth in C.D. Cal. 10 Local Rule 79-5.1 for filing documents under seal. Where one Party or third party 11 wishes to file or lodge any documents or things with the Court under seal, the other 12 Party or Parties shall not unreasonably withhold agreement to such filing or 13 lodging under seal. If such agreement is provided, the Parties shall submit to the 14 Court a stipulation and proposed order for such filing or lodging under seal. In 15 any event, If no such agreement is provided, then the filing or lodging Party or 16 third party shall submit an application and proposed order to the Court pursuant to 17 C.D. Cal. Local Rule 79-5.1. (FFM) 11.2 The Party filing Protected Material under C.D. Cal. Local Rule 18 19 79-5.1 shall designate to the Clerk that all or a designated portion thereof is subject 20 to this Protective Order and is requested to be kept under seal, except that upon the 21 failure of the filing Party to so designate, any Party may do so. 22 23 12. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED 24 PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION 25 12.1 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in 26 other litigation that compels disclosure of any Protected Material, that Party must: 27 Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 12.1.1 promptly notify in writing the designating Party or 28 third party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 11 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 12.1.2 promptly notify in writing the party who caused the 2 subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material 3 covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such 4 notification shall include a copy of this Protective Order; and 5 12.1.3 cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures 6 sought to be pursued by the designating Party or third party whose Confidential 7 Information may be affected. 8 12.2 If the designating Party or third party timely seeks a protective 9 order, the Party served with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any 10 information designated in this action as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY 11 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY before a determination by the 12 court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the 13 designating Party or third party’s permission. The designating Party or third party’s 14 shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection of its Confidential 15 Information. Nothing in this Protective Order should be construed as authorizing 16 or encouraging any Party or non-party in this action to disobey a lawful directive 17 from another court. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2014. 20 21 22 23 24 /S/ FREDERICK F. MUMM The Honorable Frederick F. Mumm United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 12 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 EXHIBIT A ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 4 I, ___________________________, declare under penalty of perjury that I 5 have read in its entirety and understand the Protective Order that was issued by the 6 United States District Court for the Central District of California on ____________, 7 2014 in the case of Aslami v. Nichia America Corporation, Case No. 2:14-cv-02785 8 JAK (FFMx). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this 9 Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could 10 expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly 11 promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject 12 to this Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the 13 provisions of this Order. 14 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court 15 for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this 16 Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of 17 this action. 18 19 20 Date City and State where sworn and signed. Print Name Signature 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 6209852.1 28 13 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?