Sean Park v. Love Culture, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 32 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (yb)
1
2
3
4
John K. Park, State Bar Number: 175212
Park Law Firm, APC
3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1110
Los Angeles, CA 90010
(213) 389-3777
park@parklaw.com
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
SEAN PARK, an individual,
CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-02965-AJW
Plaintiff
Honorable Magistrate Judge: Andrew J.
Wistrich
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
v.
LOVE CULTURE, INC., a California
Corporation, doing business as www.love
culture.com; MICHELLE, INC., California
Corporation ; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
ORDER ON STIPULATION
BETWEEN SEAN PARK AND
MICHELLE, INC. TO DISMISS, AND
DISMISSAL OF THE CASE.
__________________________________
20
21
MICHELLE, INC., a California
Corporation,
22
Complaint Filed: April 17, 2014
Trial Date: May 12, 2015; 8:30 a.m.
Counter-complainant,
23
v.
24
25
SEAN PARK, an individual; and ROES 110, inclusive,
26
Counter-defendant
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALL PARTIES
1
2
ORDER:
3
4
5
6
7
After review of the parties’ stipulation for dismissal, and finding good cause
therein:
THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff’s complaint against Michelle, Inc., a California corporation, is hereby
8
9
10
11
12
dismissed with prejudice;
2. Counterclaimant’s countercomplaint against Sean Park., an individual, is hereby
dismissed with prejudice;
3. Parties will each bear his or its respective costs and attorneys’ fees as incurred
13
14
15
against one another in connection with the claims released herein; and
4. The entire case is hereby closed.
16
17
18
19
SO ORDERED
20
21
DATED: February 9, 2015
22
23
24
By:
Hon. Andrew J. Wistrich
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALL PARTIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?