Sean Park v. Love Culture, Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 32 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (yb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 John K. Park, State Bar Number: 175212 Park Law Firm, APC 3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1110 Los Angeles, CA 90010 (213) 389-3777 park@parklaw.com 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 SEAN PARK, an individual, CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-02965-AJW Plaintiff Honorable Magistrate Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 v. LOVE CULTURE, INC., a California Corporation, doing business as www.love culture.com; MICHELLE, INC., California Corporation ; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 ORDER ON STIPULATION BETWEEN SEAN PARK AND MICHELLE, INC. TO DISMISS, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. __________________________________ 20 21 MICHELLE, INC., a California Corporation, 22 Complaint Filed: April 17, 2014 Trial Date: May 12, 2015; 8:30 a.m. Counter-complainant, 23 v. 24 25 SEAN PARK, an individual; and ROES 110, inclusive, 26 Counter-defendant 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALL PARTIES 1 2 ORDER: 3 4 5 6 7 After review of the parties’ stipulation for dismissal, and finding good cause therein: THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint against Michelle, Inc., a California corporation, is hereby 8 9 10 11 12 dismissed with prejudice; 2. Counterclaimant’s countercomplaint against Sean Park., an individual, is hereby dismissed with prejudice; 3. Parties will each bear his or its respective costs and attorneys’ fees as incurred 13 14 15 against one another in connection with the claims released herein; and 4. The entire case is hereby closed. 16 17 18 19 SO ORDERED 20 21 DATED: February 9, 2015 22 23 24 By: Hon. Andrew J. Wistrich 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALL PARTIES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?