Signal IP, Inc. v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.

Filing 72

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John A. Kronstadt, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 71 . ORDERED. ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims asserted in thissuit between plaintiff Signal IP. Inc. and defendant Porsche Cars North America,Inc. arc hereby dismi ssed with prejudice, subject to the terms of that certainagreement entitled SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT and dated August 3, 2015.It is further ORDERED that all attorneys fees and costs are to be borne bythe party that incurred them and neither party shall be required to pay any costs, attorney fees or other expenses of the other party that are associated with the matters settled by this Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 Case No. Case No. 2:14-cv-03114-JAK (JEMx) SIGNAL IP, INC., a California 9 corporation, 11 [Related to 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-02962-JAK (JEMx); 8:14-cv-00491-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv02963 JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-02457JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-03111-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-03109-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-03113-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv03108-JAK (JEMx); 8:14-cv-00497JAK (JEMx)] Plaintiff, 10 vs. 12 PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 16 17 Hon. John A. Kronstadt 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 41406.016-2511804v1 (JLH) Case No. 2:14-cv-03114-JAK (JEMx) [ 1 Two parties presented a Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of all 2 claims and counterclaims asserted between plaintiff Signal IP. Inc. and defendant 3 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. in this case, and the Court agreeing that it is 4 appropriate for these parties to implement their agreement, it is hereby 5 ORDERED. ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims asserted in this 6 suit between plaintiff Signal IP. Inc. and defendant Porsche Cars North America, 7 Inc. arc hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of that certain 8 agreement entitled “SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT” and dated 9 August 3, 2015. 10 It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees and costs are to be borne by 11 the party that incurred them and neither party shall be required to pay any costs, 12 attorney fees or other expenses of the other party that are associated with the matters 13 settled by this Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice. 14 15 DATED: August 21, 2015 16 17 Hon. John A. Kronstadt U.S. District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 41406.016-2511804v1 (JLH) Case No. 2:14-cv-03114-JAK (JEMx) 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?