Davon Carey Griffith v. Sandra Pennywell
Filing
75
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge James V. Selna re 73 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (mba)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DAVON CAREY GRIFFITH,
11
12
13
14
Case No. CV 14-03251-JVS (KES)
Petitioner,
v.
SANDRA ALFARO, Warden,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Respondent.
15
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other
17
records on file herein, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United
18
States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of
19
those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been
20
made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate
21
Judge with one addition.
22
23
Petitioner contends that the time for modifying his sentence on his drug
24
conviction under California Penal Code Section 170(d) had lapsed, and that there
25
was a jurisdiction defect in the modified sentence. (Objection to Magistrate’s
26
Report and Recommendation, p. 4.) Assuming habeas relief is available for pure
27
errors of state law, the error was harmless since the resentencing resulted in a
28
reduced sentence. See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 637-38 (1993).
1
2
3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the
Petition with prejudice.
4
5
6
7
DATED: January 23, 2017
____________________________________
JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?