Rudd Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTED MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 30 ,This case is ordered re-opened by Judge Dean D. Pregerson . (lc). Modified on 3/20/2015 (lc).
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RUDD MILLER,
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
15
Defendants.
___________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 14-03392 DDP (AJWx)
ORDER GRANTED MOTION TO VACATE
DISMISSAL
[Dkt. No. 30]
16
17
On December 23, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss
18
this case on grounds of insufficient pleading and certain statutes
19
of limitations having run. (Dkt. No. 26.)
20
an opposition to the motion by 21 days prior to the hearing date on
21
the motion, as required by local rules, and the Court vacated the
22
hearing and granted the motion to dismiss on the ground that it was
23
unopposed and therefore tacitly consented to.
24
Plaintiff did not file
(Dkt. No. 29.)
Plaintiffs’ counsel has filed the present motion, asking the
25
Court to vacate the previous order dismissing the complaint.
26
No. 30.)
27
28
Defendant has not opposed the motion to vacate.
Defendant’s counsel served its motion via the Court’s
electronic ECF system.
(Dkt. No. 26 at 16:11.)
Plaintiff
(Dkt.
1
represents to the Court that she did not receive this service,
2
because the ECF emails to her were diverted to a spam folder.
3
(Decl. Lauren Rode, ¶¶ 4-7.)
4
that she has been working toward resolving the case and would not
5
have failed to oppose the motion but for the accidental diversion
6
of the ECF emails.
7
finds that Plaintiff’s failure to oppose the motion was due to
8
“excusable neglect.”
9
Plaintiff’s counsel also represents
(Id.; Mot. Vacate at 7-8.)
The Court therefore
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1).
Good cause having been shown, and in light of the Court’s
10
strong policy of deciding cases on the merits, the motion to vacate
11
the dismissal is GRANTED.
This case is ordered re-opened.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
Dated: March 20, 2015
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?