Omega Consulting v. 10705 Rose Ave LLC et al

Filing 2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H. King. The Court previously received from Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s): a Complaint or Petition without an accompanying IFP Request, and without payment of the filing fees. The Court sent a warning letter to Plainti ff(s)/Petitioner(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under thiscase number., Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Omega Consulting CASE NUMBER 2: 14-cv-03831-UA Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) v. ~----------------------------------- 10705 Rose Ave LLC, Lancam Properties LLC ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendant(s). The Court previously received from Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s): D an IFP Request or financial information with no accompanying Complaint or Petition. IZJ a Complaint or Petition without an accompanying IFP Request, and without payment of the filing fees. J The Court sent a warning letter to Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal of this case. More than TaiRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected. ' Accordingly, this case is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: I July 28,2014 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?