adidas AG et al v. Arriba Sports et al
Filing
41
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Co urt, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than July 24, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed as to Defendant Mundo Deportivo Zava Imports Inc served on 6/6/2014, answer due 6/27/2014, Defendant Meca Imports Inc. served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Cool Wholesale served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Rimab Sports served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Marcos Gonzalez served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2 014, Defendant Raymundo's Soccer served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Fidel Gonzalez served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Najam Javed served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Imran Javed served on 6/9/201 4, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Maple Sports Inc served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Equipe Imports Inc served on 6/10/2014, answer due 7/1/2014, and Defendant Arturo Zavala served on 6/10/2014, answer due 7/1/2014, for lack of prosecution. (pc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
2:14-cv-04184-SVW-JEM
Title
adidas AG et al v. Arriba Sports et al
Present: The Honorable
Date
July 10, 2014
STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Paul M. Cruz
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A
N/A
Proceedings:
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
This Order is issued pursuant to FRCP 4(m), which requires that plaintiff(s) serve the summons and
complaint upon all defendants within 120 days after filing the complaint. The Court may dismiss the action
prior to the 120 days, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.
It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action
diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary,
plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations
affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1.
The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected
below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no
later than July 24, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed as to Defendant Mundo Deportivo Zava
Imports Inc served on 6/6/2014, answer due 6/27/2014, Defendant Meca Imports Inc. served on 6/9/2014,
answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Cool Wholesale served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant
Rimab Sports served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Marcos Gonzalez served on 6/9/2014,
answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Raymundo's Soccer served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant
Fidel Gonzalez served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Najam Javed served on 6/9/2014,
answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Imran Javed served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Maple
Sports Inc served on 6/9/2014, answer due 6/30/2014, Defendant Equipe Imports Inc served on 6/10/2014,
answer due 7/1/2014, and Defendant Arturo Zavala served on 6/10/2014, answer due 7/1/2014, for lack of
prosecution.
As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it
is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.
•
Proof of service of summons and complaint (applicable for defendant(s) who have not been
served);
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
PMC
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
2:14-cv-04184-SVW-JEM
Title
adidas AG et al v. Arriba Sports et al
•
•
•
Date
July 10, 2014
In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants
Request for entry of default by plaintiff(s) (applicable where defendants have been served but
not answered);
Motion for default judgment.
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand
submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by
plaintiff(s) is due.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
PMC
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?