adidas AG et al v. Arriba Sports et al

Filing 87

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS MAPLE SPORTS, INC. AND IMRAN JAVED,INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS MAPLE SPORTS, INC., ON CONSENT filed by Judge Stephen V. Wilson (pj)

FILED
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
DENNIS L. WILSON (State Bar No. 5407)
[e-mail]
CAROLINE Y. BUSSIN (State Bar No. 239343)
[e-mail]
9720 Wilshire Blvd PH
Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2018
Telephone:[phone]
Facsimile: 310-860-0363

NOV 12, 2014
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BY: ___________________ DEPUTY
PMC

R. CHARLES HENN, JR. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
CHARLES H. HOOKER III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
NICHOLE DAVIS CHOLLET (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800
Atlanta, GA 30309-4530
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADIDAS AG AND ADIDAS AMERICA, INC.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

ADIDAS AG AND ADIDAS
AMERICA, INC.,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff,
v.
ARRIBA SPORTS, DOING
BUSINESS AS SOCCER
WAREHOUSE; JOHN DOE,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING
BUSINESS AS ARRIBA SPORTS
AND SOCCER WAREHOUSE;
MUNDO DEPORTIVO ZAVA
IMPORTS INC., DOING BUSINESS
AS ARZA SOCCER; ARTURO
ZAVALA, INDIVIDUALLY AND
DOING BUSINESS AS MUNDO
DEPORTIVO ZAVA IMPORTS INC.
AND ARZA SOCCER; MAPLE
SPORTS INC.; IMRAN JAVED,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING
BUSINESS AS MAPLE SPORTS

Case No. 2:14-cv-4184-SVW-JEM
(PROPOSED) PERMANENT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
INJUNCTION AGAINST
DEFENDANTS MAPLE SPORTS,
INC. AND IMRAN JAVED,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING
BUSINESS AS MAPLE SPORTS,
INC., ON CONSENT

(PROPOSED) PERMANENT INJUNCTION

15

INC.; MECA IMPORTS, INC.,
DOING BUSINESS AS MEGA
SOCCER; NAJAM JAVED,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING
BUSINESS AS MECA IMPORTS,
INC. AND MEGA SOCCER;
RAYMUNDO’S SOCCER; MARCOS
GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND
DOING BUSINESS AS
RAYMUNDO’S SOCCER; COOL
WHOLESALE; JOHN DOE,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING
BUSINESS AS COOL
WAREHOUSE; EQUIPE IMPORTS,
INC.; FIDEL GONZALEZ,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING
BUSINESS AS EQUIPE IMPORTS,
INC.; G SPORTS; GHALIB SROUR,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING
BUSINESS AS G SPORTS; RIMAB
SPORTS, DOING BUSINESS AS
RIMABSPORTS.COM; JOHN DOE
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING
BUSINESS AS RIMAB SPORTS
AND RIMABSPORTS.COM; SUPER
GROUP LA, INC.; AND EDGARDO
LOPEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND
DOING BUSINESS AS SUPER
GROUP LA, INC.

16

Defendants.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

17
18

Having considered the Complaint on file in this action, and Defendants Maple

19

Sports, Inc. and Imran Javed, individually and doing business as Maple Sports, Inc.

20

(collectively, “Maple Sports”) having consented to the terms of the permanent

21

injunction set forth below, this Court hereby finds as follows:

22

1.

Plaintiffs adidas America, Inc. and adidas AG (collectively, “adidas”)

23

own and extensively use the Three-Stripe trademark (the “Three-Stripe Mark”),

24

which is covered by valid U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 870,136, 961,353,

25

1,815,956, 1,833,868, 2,016,963, 2,058,619, 2,278,589, 2,278,591, 2,284,308,

26

2,909,861, 2,999,646, 3,029,127, 3,029,129, 3,029,135, 3,063,742, 3,063,745,

27

3,087,329, 3,183,656, 3,183,663, and 3,236,505. adidas uses the Three-Stripe Mark

28

-2(PROPOSED) PERMANENT INJUNCTION

1
2

in connection with footwear and apparel, among other goods.
2.

On May 30, 2014, adidas filed a Complaint claiming, inter alia, that

3

Maple Sports was manufacturing, importing, distributing, marketing, promoting,

4

offering for sale, and selling apparel bearing confusingly similar imitations of

5

adidas’s federally registered Three-Stripe Mark (the “Infringing Apparel”).

6

Photographs of representative examples of the Infringing Apparel are attached as

7

Exhibit 1.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

3.

Maple Sports, Inc. accepted service of the Summons and Complaint on

June 9, 2014 but has not yet filed an Answer or any other pleading in response to
adidas’s Complaint.
4.

Imran Javed accepted service of the Summons and Complaint on June 9,

2014 and filed an answer on July 14, 2014.
5.

The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over

Maple Sports, and venue in this action is proper in this judicial district.

15

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

16

1.

Maple Sports and all of their agents, officers, employees,

17

representatives, successors, assigns, attorneys, and all other persons acting for, with,

18

by, through, or under authority from Maple Sports, or in concert or participation with

19

Maple Sports, and each of them, are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED and

20

RESTRAINED, from:

21

a.

importing, manufacturing, producing, advertising, promoting,

22

displaying, distributing, offering for sale, or selling the Infringing

23

Apparel; and

24

b.

importing, manufacturing, producing, advertising, promoting,

25

displaying, distributing, offering for sale, or selling any other

26

apparel bearing the Three-Stripe Mark or any other confusingly

27

similar imitation of adidas’s Three-Stripe Mark, including

28

-3(PROPOSED) PERMANENT INJUNCTION

1

without limitation any apparel with one additional stripe (i.e.,

2

four stripes) or less one of the three stripes (i.e, two stripes).

3
4
5
6

2.

This Court shall have continuing jurisdiction to enforce the provisions

of the permanent injunction entered herein.
3.

The claims asserted in adidas’s Complaint are hereby dismissed with

prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs, including attorneys’ fees.

7
8

12th
November
IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of _________________, 2014.

9
10
11

The Honorable Stephen V. Wilson

12

United States District Court

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-4(PROPOSED) PERMANENT INJUNCTION

1

EXHIBIT 1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

(PROPOSED) PERMANENT INJUNCTION