Chris Patton v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

Filing 45

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 44 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Curtis Patton JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 CURTIS PATTON, an individual, 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, vs. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-04186-MWF-(JEMx) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Dept.: Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald 5A Complaint Filed: May 3, 2013 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. C.D. Cal. No. 2:14-cv-04186-MWF-(JEMx) LEGAL_US_W # 88668976.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH 3 PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 Dated: March 7, 2017 6 Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. C.D. Cal. No. 2:14-cv-04186-MWF-(JEMx) LEGAL_US_W # 88668976.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?