Thomas Whitehurst v. D. Harris et al

Filing 49

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 48 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 56 [Dkt. 39] is GRANTED; (2) Defen dants' Motion for Involuntary Dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b) [Dkt. 39] is DENIED AS MOOT; (3) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Cormack and Paulson are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); and (4) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. (ec)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THOMAS WHITEHURST,

12

Plaintiff

13
14

v.
KAUFFMANN et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 2:14-cv-4320-JVS (GJS)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all
pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, and the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The deadline to file
Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the
Court.
The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc.
56 [Dkt. 39] is GRANTED;
(2) Defendants’ Motion for Involuntary Dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc.
41(b) [Dkt. 39] is DENIED AS MOOT;
(3) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Cormack and Paulson are dismissed

1
2

without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); and
(4) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

3
4

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

5
6
7
8
9

DATE: February 27, 2017

__________________________________
JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2