Guadalupe Torres Rangel v. Dave Davey

Filing 9

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 6 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendatio n of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, except notes that the determinate portion of Petitioner's sentence was reduced, not the indeterminate portion. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (mp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 GUADALUPE TORRES RANGEL, Petitioner, v. DAVE DAVEY, Warden, Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CV 14-4327-DSF (AGR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, except notes that the determinate portion of Petitioner’s sentence was reduced, not the indeterminate portion. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. 8/8/14 DATED: ______________________ DALE S. FISCHER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?