Ken Isom et al v. Travis Marg et al
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson Defendant has failed to comply with the removal requirements of 28 U.S.C. Section 1446(b). The notice of removal does not establish the existence of federal question juri sdiction over Plaintiffs state law claims. Accordingly, the Clerk shall REMAND this case to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. The Court declines to exercise its authority under 28 U.S.C. Section 1447(c) to order Defendant to pay Plaintiffs costs and attorneys fees.remanding case to Los Angeles Supeiror Court In Los Angeles, Case number BC519973 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Letter Remand to State Court) (pj)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
Date: July 17, 2014
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
Los Angeles County Superior Court
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: Case Number: 2:14-cv-04355-SVW-CW
Previously Superior Court Case No. BC519973
Case Name: Ken Isom et al v. Travis Marg et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on July 17, 2014
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: P. Lopez email@example.com
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
CV - 103 (09/08)
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?