Alexandra Solso v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. As ORDERED in this Court's Order Re: Notice to Counsel, it is the duty of Plaintiffs counsel to schedule the parties early meeting pursuant to Federal Rule 26( f), for the purpose of making initial disclosure. As of this date, plaintiffs have failed to file a separate Rule 26(f) report, or notice the Court of plaintiff's compliance to this Courts Order. Therefore, plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing by not later than THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, for failure of plaintiffs counsel to comply with this Court's Order Re: Notice to Counsel. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
CASE NO.: CV-14-4426-R

DATE: September 17, 2014

TITLE:
ALEXANDRA SOLSO -V.- MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
==================================================================
PRESENT: HON. MANUEL L. REAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Christine Chung
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:

Not present

N/A
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not present

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF
PROSECUTION
.
Defendant Maxim Healthcare Service Inc. filed a Rule 26(f) Report on July 23,
2014, informing the Court that counsel for defendants have attempted to schedule an
early meeting with plaintiff’s counsel, but that plaintiff’s counsel failed to respond
appropriately. As ordered in this Court’s Order Re: Notice to Counsel, it is the duty of
Plaintiff’s counsel to schedule the parties’ early meeting pursuant to Federal Rule 26(f),
for the purpose of making initial disclosure.
As of this date, plaintiffs have failed to file a separate Rule 26(f) report, or notice
the Court of plaintiff’s compliance to this Court’s Order. Therefore, plaintiff is ordered to
show cause in writing by not later than September 25, 2014 why this action should not
be dismissed for lack of prosecution, for failure of plaintiff’s counsel to comply with this
Court’s Order Re: Notice to Counsel
In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local
Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court.
The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show
Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MINUTES FORM II
CIVIL - GEN

Initials of Deputy Clerk _ CCH__