Herbert Horatio Simmons v. Stan Blumenfeld et al

Filing 403

JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice: (a) all claims under RICO and federal criminal statutes; and (b) all federal claims against defendants Blumenfeld, Hofer, Schwartz, Mavi s, Croft, Clover, Hunter, Kwon, Taksar, Murphy, Adams, Lacey, Cooley, Mitchell, Garcia, Karim, and Park. IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that the following claims are dismissed without prejudice: (a) all claims for equitable relief; (b) all federal claims against defendants Casillas, Emerich, Barragan, McLean, Hernandez, Cano, and Brock; and (c) all state law claims. IT IS SO ADJUDGED. 402 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (san)

1
2
3
4
JS-6
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

HERBERT HORATIO SIMMONS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
STAN BLUMENFELD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 14-4806-JFW (JEM)
JUDGMENT

17
In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United
18
States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith,
19
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice:
20
(a) all claims under RICO and federal criminal statutes; and
21
(b) all federal claims against defendants Blumenfeld, Hofer, Schwartz, Mavis, Croft,
22
Clover, Hunter, Kwon, Taksar, Murphy, Adams, Lacey, Cooley, Mitchell, Garcia, Karim, and
23
Park.
24
IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that the following claims are dismissed without
25
prejudice:
26
(a) all claims for equitable relief;
27
28

1
2

(b) all federal claims against defendants Casillas, Emerich, Barragan, McLean,
Hernandez, Cano, and Brock; and

3

(c) all state law claims.

4

IT IS SO ADJUDGED.

5
6

DATED: January 22, 2016
JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4