Action Learning Systems, Inc. v. Bob Crowe et al
Filing
68
STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge George H. Wu. UPON CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED: 1. That the Defendants CROWE, SMITH and EAG, including any officer, agent, employee, and/or representative of EAG, and other persons w ho are in active concert or participation with the Defendants, shall be enjoined, directly or indirectly, from soliciting any ALS current employee for six months (beginning August 12, 2014 and continuing for six months from the date of this Order ) (the "No-Solicit Period") regarding leaving ALS or to provide work for or on behalf of Defendants. a. In connection with the above non-solicitation provision, ALS' counsel shall provide a list to Defendants' counsel of cur rent ALS employees as of August 12, 2014 (the "No-Solicit List"), and Defendants' counsel shall not use or disclose the "No-Solicit List" to Defendants or to anyone else. b. Defendants shall contact their counsel regardi ng any individual they seek to solicit or hire. 2. That Defendants shall have fourteen days from entry of this Order to return to ALS all items (tangible and intangible). 3. Within 7 days of entry of this Order, Defendants Smith and Crowe, through their counsel, will provide to ALS's counsel a list of all contact information they have for any individual employed by a school district that was an ALS client during Smith's and Crowe's employment with ALS. (See attached document for other requirements.) (lom)
1 JANINE C. OGANDO (CA Bar No. 165625)
Ogando Law Offices
2 21-C Orinda Way, #132
Orinda, CA 94563
3 Telephone: 925/858-9401
Ogandolaw@gmail.com
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5 ACTION LEARNING SYSTEMS, INC.
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
Case No. CV 14-5112-GW(SHx)
9 ACTION LEARNING SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware Corporation,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
BOB CROWE, an individual, KELLY
13 SMITH, an individual, ELEVATED
ACHIEVEMENT GROUP
14 INCORPORATED, and DOES 1-500,
STIPULATED PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
The Hon. George H. Wu, Presiding
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
This cause came to be heard on the motion of Plaintiff Action Learning
Systems, Inc. (“ALS”) on August 11, 2014 for the issuance of a preliminary
injunction pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The parties have stipulated and agreed to the entry of a preliminary injunction
on the terms set forth herein.
UPON CONSENT OF THE PARTIES, IT IS ACCORDINGLY
ORDERED,
1.
That the Defendants CROWE, SMITH and EAG, including any officer,
agent, employee, and/or representative of EAG, and other persons who
are in active concert or participation with the Defendants, shall be
enjoined, directly or indirectly, from soliciting any ALS current
1
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND ORDER THEREON
1279197.1
1
employee for six months (beginning August 12, 2014 and continuing
2
for six months from the date of this Order) (the “No-Solicit Period”)
3
regarding leaving ALS or to provide work for or on behalf of
4
Defendants
5
a.
In connection with the above non-solicitation provision, ALS’
6
counsel shall provide a list to Defendants’ counsel of current ALS
7
employees as of August 12, 2014 (the “No-Solicit List”), and
8
Defendants’ counsel shall not use or disclose the “No-Solicit List”
9
to Defendants or to anyone else.
10
b.
Defendants shall contact their counsel regarding any individual
11
they seek to solicit or hire. If an individual appears on the No-
12
Solicit List, the individual may not be solicited during the Non-
13
Solicit Period unless otherwise agreed in writing by ALS.
14
2.
That Defendants shall have fourteen days from entry of this Order to
15
return to ALS all items (tangible and intangible), including but not
16
limited to, the laptop computer retained by the Defendant SMITH, the
17
iPhone retained by the Defendant CROWE, and any printers, as well as
18
all other tangible items, and all documents, whether originals or copies,
19
in hardcopy or in data format, files, data, and materials, that were
20
provided to or taken by Defendants Smith and Crowe during their
21
employment with ALS, including but not limited to, ALS employee
22
contact information, ALS customer contact information, customer lists,
23
training materials, tests, forms, calendars, guides, schedules, and all
24
ALS contracts, any and all notes and emails created during
25
employment, including all transferred documents, information or other
26
data.
27
device, including any computer, telephone, hard drive, CD, DVD, or
No documents shall be deleted from any electronic storage
28
2
STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND ORDER THEREON
1279197.1
1
USB stick (whether or not the item is being returned to ALS), until
2
after Defendants’ counsel provides to ALS a list of all electronic
3
storage devices with an inventory of all ALS documents and data
4
contained on each storage device, and unless counsel for ALS agrees in
5
writing that such data can be deleted from the electronic device.
6
3.
Within 7 days of entry of this Order, Defendants Smith and Crowe,
7
through their counsel, will provide to ALS’s counsel a list of all contact
8
information they have for any individual employed by a school district
9
that was an ALS client during Smith’s and Crowe’s employment with
10
ALS.
11
contact information for the listed individuals.
12
4.
Smith and Crowe will then delete and/or discard any such
All parties to this action, including but not limited to any officer, agent,
13
employee, and/or representative of EAG and/or ALS, and all other
14
persons who are in active concert or participation with either of them,
15
shall be enjoined as follows:
16
a.
Initial soliciting of any new customer by any party shall not
17
mention or refer to the competing company of ALS or EAG, and
18
specifically, at any time, Defendants shall not mention or refer to
19
any non-public information relating to ALS’ financial situation,
20
pricing, services, marketing or contract information.
21
b.
The parties shall not disparage each other, including but not
22
limited to making any statement that any party is going out of
23
business or making any reference to the pending litigation to any
24
third party. If asked about the litigation, the parties shall state that
25
the litigation is pending.
26
27
5.
Because the parties have been unable to agree to the terms of a
stipulated injunction pertaining to ALS’s allegations of copyright
28
3
STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND ORDER THEREON
1279197.1
1
infringement, a hearing will take place before the court regarding those
2
issues on a date to be agreed upon.
3
THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS:
4
6.
This Agreed Preliminary Injunction is entered by agreement of the
5
parties for the sole purpose of conserving judicial resources and
6
limiting the cost of litigation, and as such, nothing in this Order
7
constitutes an admission or waiver of any right, claim or defense by any
8
party, including without limitation, any claim for attorneys’ fees
9
incurred either prior to or subsequent to the entry of this Order.
10
7.
11
12
The Court’s Order will remain in full force and effect or as this Court
specifically orders otherwise;
8.
If either party has reason to believe there is a breach of this preliminary
13
injunction, that party will provide written notice of the alleged breach
14
to the other party within forty-eight (48) business hours of the alleged
15
breach. The parties will then confer in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
16
If the alleged breach has not been resolved after the passage of five (5)
17
business days, the party seeking relief under this Order may apply to
18
the Court for relief ex parte basis without the need to follow the regular
19
motion schedule.
20
21 IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of October, 2014.
22
23
24
THE HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND ORDER THEREON
1279197.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?