Douglas Eric Ross v. Brian Stinewand et al
Filing
290
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation (Final), 289 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 261) is GRANTED and judgment be entered for Defendants. (dv)
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DOUGLAS ERIC ROSS,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
Case No. CV14-05291-RGK (KES)
v.
DEPUTY BRIAN STEINWAND,
et al.,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendants.
14
15
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the
16
records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United
17
States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of
18
those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been
19
made. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the
20
United States Magistrate Judge.
21
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment (Dkt. 261) is GRANTED and judgment be entered for Defendants.
23
24
DATED: November 06, 2017
25
26
27
28
____________________________________
R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?