In re: Michael J. and Lisa D. Kessler

Filing 6

JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Bohbot shall take nothing by way of the Adversary Proceeding. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

1 MARTIN J. BRILL (State Bar No. 53220)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

[e-mail]
DANIEL H. REISS (State Bar No. 150573)
[e-mail]
TODD M. ARNOLD (State Bar No. 221868)
[e-mail]
LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P.
10250 Constellation Boulevard, Suite 1700
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6

9 Counsel for Defendant Michael J. Kessler
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15 In re:
16

MICHAEL J. KESSLER, AND
17 LISA D. KESSLER,
18

Debtors and
Debtors in Possession.

19
20

21 MERCEDES BOHBOT,
22

Plaintiff,

23 v.
24

MICHAEL J. KESSLER, et al.

25
26

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

USDC Case No.: 2:14-cv-05353-JVS
Bankruptcy Case No.: 2:14-bk-10717-ER
Chapter 11 Case
Bankruptcy Adv. No.: 2:14-ap-01115-ER

JUDGMENT

27
28

1

Upon review of the “Report and Recommendation of the Honorable

1
2

Ernest M. Robles, United States Bankruptcy Judge, to the United States District

3
4

Court for the Central District of California Containing Proposed Findings of

5 Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Final Judgment Regarding Defendant’s Motion
6

for Judgment on the Pleadings” (the “Report and Recommendation”), entered as

7
8

docket number 39 in the adversary proceeding (the “Adversary Proceeding”) of

9 Mercedes Bohbot (“Bohbot”) v. Michael J. Kessler (“Kessler”), Adversary
10

Proceeding Case No.: 2:14-ap-01115-ER, to which Bohbot did not object, the

11
12 Court hereby adopts, in full, the Report and Recommendation, and the findings
13 of fact and conclusions of law contained therein, and enters judgment as
14

follows:

15
16

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

17

1.

18

Bohbot’s “Motion for Remand” of the Adversary Proceeding

(Adversary Proceeding Dkt. No. 29) is hereby denied in its entirety.

19

2.

20

Kessler’s “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings” in the Adversary

21 Proceeding (Adversary Proceeding Dkt. No. 8) is hereby granted in its entirety.
22

3.

Bohbot’s “First Amended Complaint” against Kessler in the

23
24 Adversary Proceeding, and all claims asserted therein, are hereby dismissed
25 with prejudice.
26
27

///

28 / / /

2

1
2

4.

Bohbot shall take nothing by way of the Adversary Proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5 Dated: August 06, 2014
6
7
8

HON. JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10 CC: US Bankruptcy Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3