Security National Insurance Company v. City of Montebello

Filing 79

FINAL JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, Related to: Stipulation for Judgment, 78 . It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment shall be entered in favor and against Security National and in favor of and against Montebello. (See document for further details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE Case No. CV-14-5374-SS COMPANY, a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 [Assigned for all purposes to the Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, Courtroom 23] vs. CITY OF MONTEBELLO, a California municipal entity, 16 FINAL JUDGMENT Defendant 17 18 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 19 20 21 On March 31, 2015, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, 22 or in the alternative, partial summary judgment. After fully considering all papers 23 on file herein, including the papers filed by the parties in support of and in 24 opposition to said motions, and oral argument by the counsel for the parties and 25 having been fully advised as to all relevant facts, arguments and contentions, on 26 May 29, 2015, the Honorable Suzanne H. Segal, United States District Court 27 Magistrate Judge, entered an Order (1) Granting In Part, and Denying In Part, 28 Security National’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Partial {00110134.DOCX 1} [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 1 Summary Judgment; and (2) Denying City of Montebello’s Motion for Summary 2 Judgment or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (the “Order”; Docket 3 no. 75). 4 The parties stipulated that the Order effectively resolved all of the pleaded 5 claims for relief and causes of action and jointly requested entry of a final, 6 appealable judgment. A copy of the parties’ stipulation for entry of final judgment 7 is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by this reference. 8 Based thereon, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that 9 judgment shall be entered in favor and against Security National and in favor of 10 and against Montebello, as follows: 11 12 1. Judgment shall be and hereby is entered in favor of Montebello as to 13 the single claim for relief set forth in Security National’s Complaint 14 for declaratory relief; 15 16 2. Judgment shall be and hereby is entered in favor of Security National 17 as to Montebello’s claims for relief for breach of contract and tortious 18 breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing set forth 19 in Montebello’s Counterclaim; 20 21 3. Judgment shall be and hereby is entered in favor of Montebello as to its claim for relief for declaratory relief in the Counterclaim; 22 23 24 4. Each party is to bear its own costs of suit and attorneys’ fees incurred herein. 25 26 27 28 {00110134.DOCX 1} 2 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 1 5. There being no just reason to delay the entry of this judgment, this 2 judgment is final and the Clerk is directed to enter this final judgment 3 forthwith pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. 4 5 DATED: 7/22/15 6 7 ____________/S/_____________ Honorable Suzanne H. Segal United States District Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00110134.DOCX 1} 3 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?