Elinor Otto v. Employee Retirement Income Plan - Hourly West et al

Filing 46

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: See Judgment for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 2300
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
[phone]

PAYNE & FEARS LLP

11

CASE NO. 2:14CV5426–JAK–PLAx

ELINOR OTTO, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,

12

Plaintiffs,

JUDGMENT

13

v.
14

18

EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT
INCOME PLAN – HOURLY WEST,
fka EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT
INCOME PLAN OF McDONNELL
DOUGLAS CORPORATION –
HOURLY WEST PLAN, an ERISA
pension plan. and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,

19

JS-6

Defendants.

15
16
17

20
21
22

The Court, having received and reviewed the cross-motions for summary

23

judgment by Plaintiff ELINOR OTTO and Defendant EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT

24

INCOME PLAN – HOURLY WEST, as well as the entire record before the Court,

25

including the Administrative Record, Declarations and Exhibits, and the parties

26

having appeared before the Court on February 23, 2015, and a decision having been

27

duly rendered,

28

JUDGMENT

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment is

2

entered in favor of Defendant on Plaintiff’s only claim for relief in her Complaint

3

under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), that Plaintiff shall take nothing by her Complaint,

4

and that Defendant shall recover its costs.

5
6
7

DATED: March 26, 2015

_____________________________________
The Honorable John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge

8
9
10

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 2300
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
[phone]

PAYNE & FEARS LLP

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JUDGMENT