Geoffrey Romsa v. Ikea US West, Inc. et al
Filing
10
ORDER Remanding Case to Los Angeles Superior Court for Lack ofSubject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Margaret M. Morrow remanding case to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number BC538037. Ikea has failed to carry its burden of showing that the court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear this action. As a consequence, the clerk is directed to remand the case to Los Angeles Superior Court forthwith. Made JS-6, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (ah)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
SOUTHERN DIVISION
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
Date:
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
Name & Address
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Re: Case Number: CV 14-05552-MMM(JEMx)
Previously Superior Court Case No. BC538037
Case Name: Geoffrey Romsa vs IKEA North America Capital, Inc., et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on August 28, 2014
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: ANEL HUERTA
Deputy Clerk
213-894-7857
G Western
✘
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
By:
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?