Meghan Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Filing
39
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL FOR PLAINTIFF MEGHAN AGUILAR AND REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL by Judge Manuel L. Real: The Court hereby ORDERS that the dismissal of this action is fair and appropriate due to the Plaintiff's failure to respond to discovery and/or failure to prosecute this action. The Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed by the Parties' Counsel 38 is hereby approved. This case is dismissed with prejudice. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
1
JS-6
2
FILED
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
3
F
4
5
Ay 2 6 2015
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORN
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MEGHAN AGUILAR, et al.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
V.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and Does
1 through 10 inclusive,
15
Defendant.
16
Case No.: CV 14-5644 R (AJWx)
Complaint Filed: July 21, 2014
[PROPO1 ORDER RE JOINT
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
FOR PLAINTIFF MEGHAN
AGUILAR AND REQUEST FOR
COURT APPROVAL
Courtroom: 8 - Spring Street
Trial Date:
October 6, 2015
Final Pretrial Conf.: September 14, 2015
17
18
19
Counsel for the Parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this action as it
20
relates to the claims of the sole remaining plaintiff, MEGHAN AGUTLAR. These
21
claims were originally asserted following decertification of two collective actions
22
that sought damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) on behalf of
23
police officers employed by the City of Los Angeles’ Police Department (LAPD). 1
24
Plaintiff MEGHAN AGUILAR’s claims were included with those asserted on
25
behalf of 99 additional officers who were also opt-in members of the original
26
collective actions until decertification in May 2014. The claims of the 99 other
27
28
Alaniz v. City of Los Angeles (Case No. 2:04-cv-08592-AG-AJWx) and Cesar
Mata v. City of Los Angeles (Case No. 2:07-cv-06782-AG-AJWx).
929239.1 L0160-061
[Proposed] Order re Joint Stipulation for Dismissal for Plaintiff Meghan Aguilar and Request for Court
Approval
1
officers were subsequently dismissed due to misjoinder and only the claims of
2
Plaintiff MEGHAN AGUILAR remain actively pending. 2
3
The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal and is of the
4
opinion that dismissal of Plaintiff MEGHAN AGUILAR’s claims for failing to
5
6
provide discovery responses and for lack of prosecution is fair and appropriate
---- a
given the circumstances. For the foregoing reasons,
7
THE COURT HEREBY MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER:
8
The dismissal of this action is fair and appropriate due to the Plaintiff’s
9
failure to respond to discovery and/or failure to prosecute this action. The Joint
10
Stipulation for Dismissal filed by the Parties’ Counsel is hereby approved. This
11
case is dismissed with prejudice.
Ce
E
0.9 .
-
_1
1
11
.,
..
-’.
.
-
-.
.
-.---
-
-
15
0
16
I.
I-
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
Dated:
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff MEGHAN AGUILAR is the first-named officer in the caption of the
Complaint filed in this action.
2
929239.1 L0160-061
[Proposed] Order re Joint Stipulation for Dismissal for Plaintiff Meghan Aguilar and Request for Court
Approval
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?