Dino Angelo et al v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 68

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff DINO ANGELO take nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits with prejudice., (bp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DINO ANGELO, et al.,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

Complaint Filed: July 21, 2014
JUDGMENT

v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and
DOES 1 through 10,

15

Case No.: CV14-5696 RGK (JCx)

Courtroom: 850 - Roybal

Defendant.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
953005.2 LO160-069

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1
2

On July 24, 2015, this Court previously ordered that Plaintiff DINO
ANGELO’s Complaint be dismissed.

3

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff DINO

4

ANGELO take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits with prejudice.

5
6

Dated: August 5, 2015

7

___________________________________
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
953005.2 LO160-069

2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT