Talmadge Adib Talib v. Peter Nicholas et al
Filing
23
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt 20 . See Order for more information. (twdb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
TALMADGE ADIB TALIB,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
PETER NICHOLAS et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 14-05871-JAK (DFM)
Order Accepting Report and
Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Second
19
Amended Complaint, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of
20
the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has made a de
21
novo determination of those portions of the reports to which objections are
22
made.
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1.
25
and accepted.
26
2.
27
28
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Miguel and Rob Van Lingen
are dismissed with prejudice.
3.
Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants in their official capacities
1
2
3
4
5
6
are dismissed with prejudice.
4.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants LASD and the County of Los
Angeles are dismissed with prejudice.
5.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants based upon violations of
criminal statutes are dismissed with prejudice.
6.
Plaintiff’s newly-added claims arising out of an alleged incident on
7
July 10, 2013, are dismissed without prejudice to those claims being filed in a
8
separate action.
9
7.
If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a
10
Third Amended Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this
11
Order that is limited to his claims against Defendants Nicholas, Gonsalves,
12
Nunes, Moyer, Sanchez, and Vera in their individual capacities only.
13
14
Dated: 2/2/15
______________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?