Gary D. Morgan v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
6
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle re Order To Show Cause. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/29/2014. (ec)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 14-5905-PSG-MAN
Title
Gary D. Morgan v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Present: The Honorable
Date
December 9, 2014
MARGARET A. NAGLE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Earlene Carson
Deputy Clerk
N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A
N/A
Proceedings:
(In Chambers) Order
Plaintiff filed a Complaint For Judicial Review Of Decision Of Commissioner Of Social Security on
July 29, 2014. In paragraph I of its July 31, 2014 Case Management Order, the Court ordered plaintiff
to promptly serve the summons and complaint on the Commissioner and to file a Proof of Service,
showing compliance with the Order, within 28 days after filing the Complaint. The Order warned
plaintiff that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the case. The Court’s review of the file
indicates that, to date, plaintiff has not filed a Proof of Service and more than 133 days have elapsed
since the filing of the Complaint.
Accordingly, on or before December 29, 2014, plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED TO SHOW GOOD
CAUSE, why no Proof of Service has been filed and why this case should not be dismissed for lack of
diligent prosecution and failure to comply with the Court’s prior Order. In lieu of responding to this
Order to Show Cause, plaintiff may file the required proof of service.
Plaintiff is expressly cautioned that his failure to timely respond to this Order could result in a
recommendation to dismiss this action for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)
and Local Rule 41-1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
efc
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?