Li-Ming Cheng et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
Filing
145
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 144 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II that the entire action, including the complaint and counterclaims, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulation of Dismissal and the settlement agreement reached by the parties to this action, and that the parties to this action shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
14
15
16
ZIPSHADE INDUSTRIAL (B.V.I.)
CORP., a British Virgin Island
corporation,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Case No.: 2:14-cv-05934-ODW-JC
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC., a
North Carolina limited liability
company; WHOLE SPACE
INDUSTRIES LTD., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 – 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
_________________________________
And Related Counterclaims.
25
26
The Court has received and considered the parties’ stipulation for dismissal of
27
the entire action with prejudice under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule
28
41(a)(1) (ECF No. 144), and, based upon that stipulation,
-1-
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
IT IS ORDERED that the entire action, including the complaint and
2
counterclaims, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, that this Court shall retain
3
jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulation of Dismissal and the settlement agreement
4
reached by the parties to this action, and that the parties to this action shall bear their
5
own attorney’s fees and costs incurred in this action.
6
7
September 7, 2017
8
9
10
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?