Li-Ming Cheng et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al

Filing 145

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 144 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II that the entire action, including the complaint and counterclaims, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulation of Dismissal and the settlement agreement reached by the parties to this action, and that the parties to this action shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 14 15 16 ZIPSHADE INDUSTRIAL (B.V.I.) CORP., a British Virgin Island corporation, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Case No.: 2:14-cv-05934-ODW-JC ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE vs. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC., a North Carolina limited liability company; WHOLE SPACE INDUSTRIES LTD., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 – 10, inclusive, Defendants. _________________________________ And Related Counterclaims. 25 26 The Court has received and considered the parties’ stipulation for dismissal of 27 the entire action with prejudice under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 28 41(a)(1) (ECF No. 144), and, based upon that stipulation, -1- ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 IT IS ORDERED that the entire action, including the complaint and 2 counterclaims, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, that this Court shall retain 3 jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulation of Dismissal and the settlement agreement 4 reached by the parties to this action, and that the parties to this action shall bear their 5 own attorney’s fees and costs incurred in this action. 6 7 September 7, 2017 8 9 10 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?