Charles Paddock v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. et al

Filing 58

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge S. James Otero. The deadline to amend the Complaint has passed, and no amended complaint has been filed. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case for failure to prosecute. This matter shall close Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

DATE: April 24, 2015

CASE NO.: CV 14-06053 SJO (Ex)
TITLE:

Priority
Send
Enter
Closed
JS-5/JS-6
Scan Only

Charles Paddock v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., et al.

========================================================================
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Victor Paul Cruz
Courtroom Clerk

Not Present
Court Reporter

COUNSEL PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:

COUNSEL PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

Not Present

Not Present

========================================================================
PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): ORDER DISMISSING CASE
This matter is before the Court on its own motion. On December 22, 2014, Defendants
DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc. ("DreamWorks"), Lewis W. Coleman, and Jeffrey Katzenberg's
(collectively, "Defendants") filed a Motion to Dismiss ("Motion"). On April 1, 2015, the Court issued
an order granting the Motion with a fifteen-day leave to amend. (See Order, ECF No. 56.) On
April 16, 2015, Lead Plaintiff Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund filed a Notice of Intent Not to
Amend. (Notice, ECF No. 57.)
The deadline to amend the Complaint has passed, and no amended complaint has been filed.
Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case for failure to prosecute. This matter shall close.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Page 1 of

1